The use of AUSRIVAS predictive models to assess the response of lotic macroinvertebrates to dams in south‐east Australia

Abstract

1. Sites immediately below seven dams in Victoria and 12 in southern New South Wales (NSW) were sampled for macroinvertebrates using rapid bioassessment techniques. Specimens were identified to the lowest taxonomic level. The dams had different operating and discharge regimes and thus potentially different downstream effects on this fauna.2. The AUStralian RIVer Assessment Scheme (AUSRIVAS) predictive models for macroinvertebrate composition were applied to the families and genera observed at Victorian sites and to the families only at the NSW sites. Lists of predicted taxa, their probabilities of occurrence and ratios of observed to expected taxa (O/E scores) were obtained from these models.3. The mean O/E score for Victoria was 0.46 at the genus level and 0.63 at the family level; for NSW the mean score at the family level was 0.62. There was no significant difference between family level scores for the two states. Thus about 40% of expected families were missing at all sites. Family level scores were highly correlated (r=0.84–0.86, P < 0.001) with numbers of families or species at a site.4. There was no correlation between family O/E scores (or family and species richness) and the degree to which current discharge levels below a dam differ from the natural patterns. Thus increased hydrological deviation did not result in greater biological degradation. In addition, there was no association between these biological characteristics and whether dams released surface or bottom water.5. All the dams seemed to cause much the same disruption to the fauna. Of the families predicted to have widespread occurrence, 9–12 were found at most sites (tolerant taxa), while a larger number (14–24) were missing (intolerant taxa). The limited recolonisation below dams may well be because of the fact that dams act as barriers to drift, the most prominent route for invertebrate colonists.