The use of an anatomic tibial baseplate in total knee arthroplasty optimizes coverage without compromising rotation: A propensity-matched evaluation

Abstract

BackgroundThe aims of this study were (1) to compare in vivo coverage and rotational alignment of 2 tibial component designs: anatomic and symmetrical; and (2) to determine if coronal deformity and tibial torsion were related to rotation and coverage. MethodsPostoperative CT scans of 200 propensity score-matched patients who underwent TKA with either an anatomic (ATC) or symmetrical tibia component (STC) were analyzed. Rotation was measured using four axes: surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA), Berger’s protocol, medio-lateral (ML) axis and posterior borders of the tibial plateau, while coverage was assessed by measuring fit and surface area. The relationship between coronal deformity, tibial torsion, rotation, and coverage was investigated. ResultsOverall, STCs had more internal rotation when measured using the sTEA (−0.6° ± 3.5 vs 0.5° ± 3.6, p = 0.03), Berger’s protocol (−21.6° ± 7.1 vs −17.9° ± 6.2, p = 0.000) and ML axes (2.9° ± 3.9 vs 8.1° ± 5.1, p = 0.000) compared to ATCs. STCs also had more posteromedial underhang (−3.3 mm ± 2.4 mm vs −1.7 mm ± 2.5 mm, p = 0.000) but smaller change in tibial torsion postoperatively (−18.4° ± 9.9° vs −13.1° ± 9.4°, p = 0.000). Tibial torsion was more pronounced in valgus than varus knees both preoperative (−25.4° ± 6.5° vs −20.2° ± 9.3°, p = 0.02) and postoperatively (−19.7° ± 7.2° vs −14.7° ± 10.3°, p = 0.04), but there was no difference in postoperative tibial torsion between ATCs and STCs in this subgroup. ConclusionThe use of an anatomic tibial baseplate optimizes coverage by reducing posterolateral overhang and posteromedial underhang. It also achieved better rotational profiles compared to STCs. However, it resulted in a larger change in tibial torsion after TKA.