Abstract

The use of address forms varies from one language community to another. Our findings, however, confirm predictions made by Brown and Gilman concerning the influence of social class and political views on changes in address system. ‘Non-reciprocity’, along the power dimension observed by Brown and Gilman, is claimed to be rapidly disappearing in Western Europe, to be replaced by a system based primarily on relative distance. This claim is actually mitigated by our findings in Egyptian society. We argue that the solidaristic, democratic, and universal forms of address, at least in Egyptian society, are in fact a version of an old elitist system tied to many of the same signals of class differences that used to determine address forms in the feudal system. The major differences is that the choice of address pronouns is reversed. This reflects eventually a problem inherent in many changing social systems, and involves, furthermore, the influence of various institutions in trying to reestablish norms during what is obviously a transitional period in Egyptian history.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.