Abstract

IntroductionAnaemia and the associated need for packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions are common in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Among many causes, blood losses from repeated diagnostic tests are contributory.MethodsThis is a before and after study in a medical ICU of a university hospital. We used a closed blood conservation device (Venous Arterial blood Management Protection, VAMP, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) to decrease PRBC transfusion requirements. We included all adult (≥18 years) patients admitted to the ICU with indwelling arterial catheters, who were expected to stay more than 24 hours and were not admitted for active gastrointestinal or any other bleeding. We collected data for six months without VAMP (control group) immediately followed by nine months (active group) with VAMP. A restrictive transfusion strategy in which clinicians were strongly discouraged from any routine transfusions when haemoglobin (Hb) levels were above 7.5 g/dL was adopted during both periods.ResultsEighty (mean age 61.6 years, 49 male) and 170 patients (mean age 60.5 years, 101 male) were included in the control and active groups respectively. The groups were comparable for age, gender, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, need for renal replacement therapy, length of stay, and Hb levels on discharge and at transfusion. The control group had higher Hb levels on admission (12.4 ± 2.5 vs. 11.58 ± 2.8 gm/dL, P = 0.02). Use of a blood conservation device was significantly associated with decreased requirements for PRBC transfusion (control group 0.131 unit vs. active group 0.068 unit PRBC/patient/day, P = 0.02) on multiple linear regression analysis. The control group also had a greater decline in Hb levels (2.13 ± 2.32 vs. 1.44 ± 2.08 gm/dL, P = 0.02) at discharge.ConclusionsThe use of a blood conservation device is associated with 1) reduced PRBC transfusion requirements and 2) a smaller decrease in Hb levels in the ICU.

Highlights

  • Anaemia and the associated need for packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions are common in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU)

  • PRBC transfusions are associated with adverse effects, including allergic, anaphylactic and haemolytic transfusion reactions, transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI), transfusionassociated circulatory overload (TACO), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), infections, and ventilator-associated pneumonia, all of which lead to significant morbidity and mortality [10,11,12,13,14]

  • There were no significant differences in age, gender, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, and percentage of patients requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the two groups (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Anaemia and the associated need for packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions are common in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Blood losses from repeated diagnostic tests are contributory. A significant number of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) receive packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions [1]. Anaemia which affects up to 90% of ICU patients by Day 3 is multifactorial [1]. One such cause is blood loss, up to 17% of which is contributed by repeated blood drawing for diagnostic tests [2,3]. PRBC transfusions are associated with adverse effects, including allergic, anaphylactic and haemolytic transfusion reactions, transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI), transfusionassociated circulatory overload (TACO), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), infections, and ventilator-associated pneumonia, all of which lead to significant morbidity and mortality [10,11,12,13,14]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call