Abstract
The United States Supreme Court’s downward trend over the past half century supports Chief Justice Roberts’s statement that law-review articles are not particularly helpful for practitioners and judges. But some law-review articles are still helpful. An author aspiring to influence the Court will want to read this article’s summarizing of qualitative and quantitative data about the Court’s use of law review articles. As source material, this article analyzes the Court’s use of law-review articles, and a few other secondary sources, from the 2011–2012 term.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
