Abstract
The overall national strategy and security goals of a nation should provide the framework and explanation for the size and composition of its armed forces and the defence budget that supports them. American military forces and budgets, however, are often planned, developed and debated as if they bore little relationship to strategy. Instead, they emerge from a system of defence policy-making and acquisition sometimes described as a ‘military industrial complex’ or ‘iron triangle’.1 Through the institutions and processes of this complex, the domestic interests involved in the formulation of national security policy can distort, even negate the nation’s strategy.KeywordsNational StrategyMilitary ForceForce StructureDomestic PoliticsDefence SpendingThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.