Abstract
This note demonstrates that the convenient and inexpensive procedure suggested by Urry (1974a) for approximating test models (i.e., the normal ogive and logistic models) tends to systematically underestimate ai (item discriminatory power) and overestimate /b i/ (item difficulty). A simple correction for error in estimated ability (θ) is presented which serves to eliminate these biases. Implications for item screening and for item parameterization via maximum likelihood methods and via Urry's more recently developed estimation procedure (1974b) are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.