The urinary bile acid profiling analysis of asymptomatic hypercholanemia of pregnancy: A pseudo-targeted metabolomics study

Abstract

BackgroundAsymptomatic hypercholanemia of pregnancy (AHP) is a controversial hypercholanemia, which is difficult to distinguish from intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). Our aim is to elucidate the characteristics of urinary bile acid (BA) profiling of women with AHP and to find potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of AHP. MethodsWe developed a pseudo-targeted approach to perform metabolomics analysis of bile acids (BAs) using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-QTOF-MS). Urinary BAs profiles were compared among AHP women (n = 20), ICP patients (n = 33) and normal controls (n = 35). ResultsThe profiling of urinary BAs was significantly different among the AHP, ICP and control groups. Compared to the control group, the AHP group had higher levels of four possible sulfated BAs and trihydroxy BAs, including the species of muricholic acid (MCA), cholic acid (CA) and six possible BAs, whereas, 20 possible sulfated BAs, taurochenodeoxycholic acid (TCDCA), tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA), and seven possible BAs were significantly lower in the AHP group than those in the ICP group. Based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, glycocholic acid (GCA) combined with T-ω-MCA were found to be the potential combination biomarker for the diagnosis (area under the curve was 0.960) of AHP, and mono-S, Gtri-S-2 combined with TLCA-S were found to be the potential combination biomarker for the differential diagnosis (area under the curve was 0.990) of AHP and ICP. ConclusionsThe metabolisms of urinary Bas were altered in the AHP group compared with the ICP group and the control group. Urinary BA profiling analysis can serve as an effective tool for the diagnosis of AHP and the differential diagnosis of AHP and ICP.