The Uracil Breath Test in the Assessment of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Activity: Pharmacokinetic Relationship between Expired 13CO2 and Plasma [2-13C]Dihydrouracil

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is prevalent in 3-5% of the Caucasian population; however, the frequency of this pharmacogenetic syndrome in the Indian population and other racial and ethnic groups remains to be elucidated. We describe an Indian patient who presented to clinic for the treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma with 5-flurouracil (5-FU) therapy who subsequently was diagnosed with DPD deficiency by using the peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) DPD radioassay. This observation prompted us to examine the data generated from healthy (cancer-free) Indian subjects who were enrolled in a large population study to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the uracil breath test (UraBT) in the detection of DPD deficiency. Thirteen Indian subjects performed the UraBT. UraBT results were confirmed by PBMC DPD radioassay. The Indian cancer patient demonstrated reduced DPD activity (0.11 nmol/min/mg protein) and severe 5-FU toxicities commonly associated with DPD deficiency. Of the 13 Indian subjects [ten men and three women; mean age, 26 years (range: 21-31 years)] enrolled in the UraBT, 12 Indian subjects demonstrated UraBT breath profiles and PBMC DPD activity within the normal range; one Indian subject demonstrated a reduced breath profile and partial DPD deficiency. DPD deficiency is a pharmacogenetic syndrome which is also present in the Indian population. If undiagnosed, the DPD deficiency can lead to death. Future epidemiological studies would be helpful to determine the prevalence of DPD deficiency among racial and ethnic groups, allowing for the optimization of 5-FU chemotherapy.

To the editor, With interest we read the article by Dr Cubero and colleagues, in which they evaluated the safety of tegafur-uracil (UFT®) in five cases with partial dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency [Cubero et al. 2012]. Based on our previous experience [Deenen et al. 2010], however, we would like to express our concern about their conclusion that UFT is a safe alternative for the treatment of patients with partial DPD deficiency. Cubero and colleagues make the erroneous and unproven statement that the presence of uracil in UFT creates an artificial DPD deficiency, and that the DPD activity in patients with normal DPD activity would then be similarly as low as in DPD-deficient patients. This assumption, however, is incorrect. As uracil is a competitive inhibitor of DPD, it competes with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for DPD-mediated metabolism. This does not mean that the activity of DPD is depleted, as suggested by Cubero and colleagues, in contrast, its activity is fully utilized, as well as for the metabolism of uracil, as for the metabolism of 5-FU. We would like to caution that treating patients with partial DPD deficiency with the standard dose of UFT may unnecessarily lead to severe, potentially lethal toxicity. Unlike the cases described by Cubero and colleagues, we could previously describe four cases presenting with comparable severe toxicity profiles upon treatment with UFT as had previously occurred during treatment with capecitabine or 5-FU. In all subjects an underlying partial DPD deficiency was identified by genotype and phenotype analyses [Deenen et al. 2010]. Furthermore, there are several pharmacological lines of argument that support our clinical observation, i.e. that the standard dose of UFT is not safe in (partial) DPD-deficient patients. First, pharmacokinetic studies have shown that DPD remains essential for the metabolism of UFT, with significantly longer half-lives of 5-FU after administration of UFT compared with 5-FU administered intravenously [Ho et al. 1998]. This is due to the presence of uracil in UFT. Since DPD-deficient patients already have longer half-lives of 5-FU than other patients [Mattison et al. 2006], presence of uracil increases its half-life even further. This in turn leads to prolonged and elevated circulating levels of 5-FU, with a subsequently increased risk of 5-FU-induced severe toxicity. Another argument underscoring the importance of normal DPD function in the safe application of UFT, is the experience with S-1. S-1 is another drug combination of tegafur, consisting of tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP) and potassium oxonate in a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1. CDHP inhibits DPD 200-fold more potently than does uracil [Shirasaka et al. 1996a, 1996b]. Even after administration of S-1, the primary 5-FU metabolite formed by DPD is observed in significant concentrations in plasma [Kim et al. 2007]. Thus, DPD remains an essential detoxification enzyme of 5-FU, even when its activity is strongly inhibited. The ultimate proof of theory is the occurrence of 18 treatment-related deaths in patients with cancer and herpes zoster given UFT plus the antiviral drug sorivudine [Pharmaceutical Affairs Bureau, 1994]. Subsequent studies in rats showed that a metabolite of sorivudine, (E)-5-(2-bromovinyl)uracil, instantly and irreversibly inactivates DPD by covalent binding, which has been identified as the underlying mechanism of these toxic deaths [Ogura et al. 1998; Okuda et al. 1998]. It is for these arguments that the Summary of Product Characteristics of UFT notes a known DPD deficiency as a contra-indication [Merck Serono, 2011]. The fact that the patients described by Cubero and colleagues did not develop significant toxicity might be due to patient selection, the slightly decreased dose intensity of 90%, or despite their DPYD*2A genotype a DPD enzyme activity within the (lower) range of normal. We are not aware of this, because DPD enzyme activity was not determined in these patients. In summary, we would like to state that standard-dose UFT is not a safe treatment in (partial) DPD-deficient patients. Instead, dose reductions of on average 50% of either capecitabine, 5-FU or UFT with careful monitoring of safety and further dose titration are proposed as the standard of care [Deenen et al. 2011].

BackgroundPretherapeutic screening for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is recommended or required prior to the administration of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. However, the best strategy to identify DPD-deficient patients remains elusive.MethodsAmong a nationwide cohort of 5886 phenotyped patients with cancer who were screened for DPD deficiency over a 3 years period, we assessed the characteristics of both DPD phenotypes and DPYD genotypes in a subgroup of 3680 patients who had completed the two tests. The extent to which defective allelic variants of DPYD predict DPD activity as estimated by the plasma concentrations of uracil [U] and its product dihydrouracil [UH2] was evaluated.ResultsWhen [U] was used to monitor DPD activity, 6.8% of the patients were classified as having DPD deficiency ([U] > 16 ng/ml), while the [UH2]:[U] ratio identified 11.5% of the patients as having DPD deficiency (UH2]:[U] < 10). [U] classified two patients (0.05%) with complete DPD deficiency (> 150 ng/ml), and [UH2]:[U] < 1 identified three patients (0.08%) with a complete DPD deficiency. A defective DPYD variant was present in 4.5% of the patients, and two patients (0.05%) carrying 2 defective variants of DPYD were predicted to have low metabolism. The mutation status of DPYD displayed a very low positive predictive value in identifying individuals with DPD deficiency, although a higher predictive value was observed when [UH2]:[U] was used to measure DPD activity. Whole exon sequencing of the DPYD gene in 111 patients with DPD deficiency and a “wild-type” genotype (based on the four most common variants) identified seven heterozygous carriers of a defective allelic variant.ConclusionsFrequent genetic DPYD variants have low performances in predicting partial DPD deficiency when evaluated by [U] alone, and [UH2]:[U] might better reflect the impact of genetic variants on DPD activity. A clinical trial comparing toxicity rates after dose adjustment according to the results of genotyping or phenotyping testing to detect DPD deficiency will provide critical information on the best strategy to identify DPD deficiency.

The cytotoxic effect of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is mediated by the inhibition of thymidylate synthase (TS), however, at the same time 5-FU is catabolized by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Efficacy of 5-FU may therefore depend on the TS and DPD activity and on pharmacogenetic factors influencing these enzymes. Our aims were (1) to determine the distribution of DPD activity, the frequency of DPD deficiency and the DPD (IVS14+1G>A) mutation in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, and study the relationship between DPD deficiency and toxicity of 5-FU; (2) to investigate the influence of TS polymorphisms and DPD activity on the survival of CRC patients receiving 5-FU-based adjuvant therapy. The frequency of DPD deficiency was determined by radiochemical methods in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of 764 CRC patients treated with 5-FU. The relationship between the TS polymorphisms, DPD activity and the disease-free and overall survival was studied in 166 CRC patients receiving 5-FU-based adjuvant therapy. TS polymorphisms were determined in the DNA samples separated from the PBMCs, by PCR-PAGE and PCR-RFLP-PAGE (restriction fragment length polymorphism) methods. Low DPD values (<10 pmol/min/106 PBMCs) were demonstrated in 160/764 patients (20.9%), and of those DPD deficiency (<5 pmol/min/106 PBMCs) was verified in 38 patients (4.9%). In the latter group severe (>Gr 3) toxicity was found in 87%. The prevalence of the DPD IVS14+1G>A mutation among the 38 DPD-deficient patients was 7.8% (3/38) and was accompanied by severe Gr 4 toxic symptoms (neutropenia, mucositis, diarrhea). TS polymorphisms showed a relationship with the survival of CRC patients. It is important to mention that by combining the 3-3 genotypes of 5'-TSER and 3'-TSUTR polymorphisms the obtained 8 genotype combinations showed significantly different Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The evaluation of these curves with Cox regression analysis resulted in two prognostically different groups: "A" good prognosis (RR<1) and "B" bad prognosis (RR>1). The disease-free- and overall survival of these two groups were significantly different. DPD activity also showed correlation with the survival; patients with DPD activity <10 pmol/min/106 PBMCs showed significantly longer disease-free and overall survival. The determination of DPD activity proved to be a more valuable parameter in the evaluation of serious 5-FU-related toxicity compared to the IVS14+1G>A mutation analysis. According to the Cox multivariate analysis the combination of germline TS polymorphisms and DPD activity is/an independent prognostic marker of survival in CRC patients treated with adjuvant 5-FU therapy.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency, a known pharmacogenetic syndrome associated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) toxicity, has been detected in 3% to 5% of the population. Genotypic studies have identified >32 sequence variants in the DPYD gene; however, in a number of cases, sequence variants could not explain the molecular basis of DPD deficiency. Recent studies in cell lines indicate that hypermethylation of the DPYD promoter might down-regulate DPD expression. The current study investigates the role of methylation in cancer patients with an unexplained molecular basis of DPD deficiency. DPD deficiency was identified phenotypically by both enzyme assay and uracil breath test, and genotypically by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography. The methylation status was evaluated in PCR products (209 bp) of bisulfite-modified DPYD promoter, using a novel denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography method that distinguishes between methylated and unmethylated alleles. Clinical samples included five volunteers with normal DPD enzyme activity, five DPD-deficient volunteers, and five DPD-deficient cancer patients with a history of 5-FU toxicity. No evidence of methylation was detected in samples from volunteers with normal DPD. Methylation was detected in five of five DPD-deficient volunteers and in three of five of the DPD-deficient cancer patient samples. Of note, one of the two samples from patients with DPD-deficient cancer with no evidence of methylation had the mutation DPYD*2A, whereas the other had DPYD*13. Methylation of the DPYD promoter region is associated with down-regulation of DPD activity in clinical samples and should be considered as a potentially important regulatory mechanism of DPD activity and basis for 5-FU toxicity in cancer patients.

Pour ou contre le phénotypage/génotypage des patients traités par le 5-fluorouracile pour prévenir les effets indésirables ?

Based on this clinical experience, we detail the principles that should guide the decision-making process regarding the prevention of 5-FU severe toxicity and propose a diagnostic algorithm in order to screen candidate patients to fluoropyrimidine therapy. In the suggested diagnostic algorithm, the predictive 5-FU test dose could be regarded as a triage test, allowing detection of the fraction of patients with normal, impaired or absent fluoropyrimidine metabolism. Other analyses, such as DPD genotyping or even DPD PBMC activity, could be used later as add-on tests and, limited to the still undiagnosed subgroup, to detect those degrees of enzyme activity impairment suitable for possible reduction of 5-FU dose or different treatments. Overall, the published data strongly suggest the use of a diagnostic algorithm based on the sequential application of a 5-FU pharmacokinetic test followed by DPD genotyping and activity in order to make a highly probable diagnosis of altered 5-FU metabolism. Moreover, the application of this model could result in a consistent reduction of costs and morbidity, by limiting genotyping and PBMC DPD activity analysis to only selected subgroups of patients.

Lethal 5-fluorouracil toxicity associated with a novel mutation in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency can lead to severe toxicity following 5-fluorouracil (5FU) or capecitabine (CAP) treatment. Uracil (U) can be used as a probe to determine systemic DPD activity. The present study was performed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a U loading dose for detecting DPD deficiency. Cancer patients with Common Toxicity Score (CTC) grade III or IV toxicity after the first or second cycle of 5-FU or CAP treatment were asked to participate. Based on DPD activity in PBMCs, patients were divided into two groups: DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) <5nmolmg(-1) *h(-1) (deficient group) and ≥ 5nmolmg(-1) *h(-1) . U 500mgm(-2) was administered orally and plasma concentrations of U and dihydrouracil (DHU) were determined. In the deficient group, polymerase chain reaction amplification of all 23 coding exons and flanking intronic regions of DPYD was performed. A U pharmacokinetic model was developed and used to determine the maximum enzymatic conversion capacity (Vmax ) of the DPD enzyme for each patient. The sensitivity and specificity of Vmax, U concentration and the U/DHU concentration ratio were determined. A total of 47 patients were included (19 DPD deficient, 28 DPD normal). Of the pharmacokinetic parameters investigated, a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 98%, respectively, was obtained for the U/DHU ratio at t=120min. The high sensitivity of the U/DHU ratio at t=120min for detecting DPD deficiency, as defined by DPD activity in PBMCs, showed that the oral U loading dose can effectively identify patients with reduced DPD activity.

2003 Background: Although DPD deficiency is a well established cause of severe FU-related toxicities, relationships between the depth of the deficiency and the intensity of the toxicity is still poorly documented. We analyzed DPD activity in a large population of patients with FU-related toxicities. Methods: Blood lymphocytes from 144 consecutive cancer patients having developed FU toxicities were collected from different French institutions between January 1993 and July 2004 (53 men, 91 women; mean age 57, extremes 31–94). DPD activity was measured with a radioenzymatic HPLC assay. The IVS14+1G>A mutation was analyzed in 102 patients (RFLP assay). Results: Grade 3–4 toxicity (WHO classification) was 64% for mucositis, 58% for neutropenia, 42% for thrombopenia, 19% for diarrhea and 14% for neurotoxicity. Toxicity led to patient death in 9 cases (8 women, 1 man). DPD activity ranged from 8 to 504 pmol/min/mg (mean 200, median 188, N=144). Nine patients had an activity < 50 pmol/min/mg (severe deficiency) and 19 had an activity between 50 and 100 pmol/min/mg (partial deficiency), thus accounting for a total of 19% deficient patients. The relative risk of developing grade 3–4 toxicity in DPD deficient patients relative to non-deficient patients was 7.69 for neurotoxicity (Fisher’s Exact test, p< 0.001), 2.93 for diarrhea (p<0.001), 1.73 for thrombopenia (p=0.01), 1.63 for mucositis (p<0.001) and 1.59 for neutropenia (p=0.005). The lower the DPD activity, the higher the mucositis, neutropenia or diarrhea grading (Spearman rank correlations, p< 0.03). Toxic deaths were significantly related to low DPD activity (Mann-Whitney p=0.002), with 7 patients out of 9 exhibiting a DPD deficiency. The DPYD mutation (wt/mut) was detected in only 2 patients; both exhibited a low DPD activity (44 and 142 pmol/min/mg) and developed grade 4 mucositis, neutropenia, thrombopenia and grade 3 neurotoxicity without toxic death. Conclusions: 1- Patients with normal DPD activity may develop FU-related toxicities. 2- The intensity of the FU toxicity is related to the severity of the DPD deficiency. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The use of fluorouracil has been complicated by unpredictable pharmacokinetics, low response rates and seemingly random toxicity. The variable pharmacology is largely due to inherited differences in expression of the metabolising enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). This converts fluorouracil to inactive metabolites (catabolic pathway) and ultimately dictates the amount of fluorouracil that is available to be metabolised to cytotoxic nucleotides (anabolic pathway). Absolute and partial DPD deficiency affect around 0.1 and 3% of the Caucasian population, respectively. Administration of conventional doses of fluorouracil to these individuals has resulted in profound bone marrow and gastrointestinal toxicity, especially in those with absolute DPD deficiency. Other forms of toxicity such as myocardial ischaemia have been difficult to attribute directly to DPD deficiency. Efforts to improve outcomes with fluorouracil have included monitoring of fluorouracil concentrations and modifying fluorouracil administration techniques (e.g. from bolus injections to protracted intravenous infusions). In general, these moves have met with limited therapeutic advancement. The recognition that DPD deficiency increases toxicity has lead to the suggestion that genotypic or phenotypic assessment of DPD status prior to initiating fluorouracil may help predict outcomes. The gene that encodes for DPD expression is called DPYD. Approximately 1% of Caucasians are heterozygotes for the DPYD*2A mutation which is the variant allele that is most frequently implicated in DPD deficiency. Screening for this mutation may identify around 60% of individuals with absolute DPD deficiency who are at the greatest risk of toxicity. Another approach is to determine DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, with low activity suggesting an increased risk of toxicity. Intratumoral DPD activity may also be assessed with high activity suggesting a poorer response to fluorouracil. Recently, drugs that inhibit DPD (e.g. eniluracil) have become available. These remove much of the variability in fluorouracil pharmacokinetics and may make assessment of DPD activity redundant. Despite the considerable inroads that have been made, further study is needed before the best means of optimising fluorouracil treatment is determined.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency can lead to severe toxicity in patients treated with a standard dose of a fluoropyrimidine such as 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine (CAP). Administration of oral uracil and subsequent measurement of uracil and dihydrouracil (DHU) plasma concentrations has been used to identify patients with DPD deficiency. Liver metastasis might influence systemic DPD activity. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of metastatic disease on the pharmacokinetics of uracil and DHU after oral administration of uracil. 500mg/m(2) uracil was administered orally to 12 subjects with stages II-III colorectal cancer (CRC) who were treated in the adjuvant setting and to 12 subjects with stage IV metastasized CRC, all treated with CAP containing therapy. All subjects had a normal DPD activity defined as >6nmol/mg/h determined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The mean uracil clearance [CL 51.7 (SD 6.4) vs. 46.7 (SD 13.0) l/h], area under the curve [AUC0-220min 20.6 (SD 6.4) vs. 21.0 (SD 5.7) hmg/l], elimination half-life [t 1/2 21 (SD 7) vs. 21 (SD 8) min], maximum concentration time [T max 27 (SD 9) vs. 25 (SD 9) min], volume of distribution [V 26.58 (SD 10.11) vs. 21.10 (SD 8.48) l] and the elimination constant [k el 2.01 (SD 0.56) vs. 2.41 (SD 0.72) h(-1)] did not differ significantly (p>0.05) non-metastatic CRD versus metastatic CRC. Metastasis does not alter uracil pharmacokinetics andis similar in CRC patients with and without metastasis. Therefore, the uracil test dose could be used as a DPD phenotype test in both adjuvantly treated and metastatic CRC patients using similar cutoff criteria to identify patients with DPD deficiency.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD, EC 1.3.1.2) is the initial and rate-limiting enzyme in the catabolism of the pyrimidine bases and it catalyzes the reduction of uracil and thymine to 5,6-dihydrouracil and 5,6-dihydrothymine, respectively. In children, a deficiency of DPD is often accompanied by a neurological disorder but a considerable variation in the clinical presentation among these patients has been reported1. In these patients, a large accumulation of uracil and thymine has been detected in urine, blood and in cerebrospinal fluid whereas no activity of DPD could be detected in fibroblasts and mononuclear cells . The detection of more than 30 patients of various nationalities with a (partial) DPD deficiency within 15 years in The Netherlands alone suggest that this type of inborn error is less rare than previously assumed 1, 2 The recent cloning of the cDNA coding for human DPD and the sequence of the entire human DPD gene3 (DPYD) has allowed the detection of the defects at the molecular level. Identification of disease-causing mutations in the DPD gene will allow rapid pre-screening of patients at risk.

e13134 Background: Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is the initial and rate-limiting enzyme in the metabolism of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Patients with a partial or complete DPD deficiency are at risk to develop severe toxicity after 5-FU administration. Uracil (U) is degraded in dihydrouracil (DHU) in a similar way as 5-FU. An oral uracil test dose might be useful to determine the systemic DPD activity by measuring uracil and its metabolite dihydrouracil in plasma. DPD deficiency is hypothesized to result in higher uracil levels and a reduced turnover of uracil into dihydrouracil. Methods: Uracil (500 mg/m2) was administered to 11 healthy volunteers with normal DPD activity (≥ 6 nmol/mg/hour) and 1 patient with colorectal carcinoma with a novel DPYD mutation and decreased DPD activity (4.6 nmol/mg/hour). DPD activity was measured in PBMC, as determined as described earlier. Blood samples were taken at t= 15, 30, 45, 60, 80, 100, 120, 150, 180, and 220 or 240 min after oral uracil intake. U and DHU pla...

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is the initial and rate-limiting enzyme in the catabolism of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and it is suggested that patients with a partial deficiency of this enzyme are at risk of developing severe 5-FU-associated toxicity. We evaluated the importance of DPD deficiency, gender and the presence of the IVS14+1G>A mutation in the etiology of 5-FU toxicity. In 61% of cases, decreased DPD activity could be detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Furthermore, the number of females (65%) in the total group of patients appeared to be higher than the number of males (35%) (p = 0.03). Patients with partial DPD deficiency appeared to have a 3.4-fold higher risk of developing grade IV neutropenia than patients with normal DPD activity. Analysis of the DPYD gene of patients suffering from grade IV neutropenia for the presence of the IVS14+1G>A mutation showed that 50% of the patients investigated were heterozygous or homozygous for the IVS14+1G>A mutation. Adopting a threshold level for DPD activity of 70% of that observed in the normal population, 14% of the population is prone to the development of severe 5-FU-associated toxicity. Below this threshold level, 90% of individuals heterozygous for a mutation in the DPYD gene can be identified. Considering the common use of 5-FU in the treatment of cancer, the severe 5-FU-related toxicities in patients with low DPD activity and the apparently high prevalence of the IVS14+1G>A mutation, screening of patients at risk before administration of 5-FU is warranted.