Abstract

Breast cancer survivors are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, called late effects, years after the completion of active treatment. Late effects can significantly impair physical functioning. The current study aimed to explore breast cancer survivors' experiences of late effects, their emotional responses to existing or potential late effects and their perceived impact. A total of 36 women treated for breast cancer in the last 10years participated in semi-structured telephone interviews. Participant views were sought with respect to knowledge, experience, and perceived longer-term risk. A thematic analysis was conducted. Four themes emerged from the data: (1) late effects awareness, (2) framing and coping, (3) uncertainty and (4) management. There was a range of emotional responses to late effects; however, many participants reported being unaware of their risk of late effects. Participants conceptualised late effects as any long-term effect of treatment regardless of the time of onset. Women reported living with constant uncertainty and feared cancer recurrence. Many were focused on managing long-term treatment side effects, rather than late effects. Many women undergo treatment and remain unaware of associated late effect risks. National guidelines recommend patients be informed about late effects; however, the results of this study suggest a gap between policy and practice. Evidence-based interventions are needed to equip women with strategies to physically and emotionally manage late effects.

Highlights

  • Detection of breast cancer through screening and increasing treatment efficacy means survival rates have increased to over 90% [1]

  • 36 women treated for breast cancer in the last 10 years participated in semi-structured telephone interviews

  • Four themes emerged from the data: (1) late effects awareness, (2) framing and coping, (3) uncertainty and (4) management

Read more

Summary

Results

54 women consented to participate and completed the online survey whilst 36 eligible women participated in interviews. Reasons for non-participation in the interview included no longer wanting to participate (n = 1), not being contactable (n = 13) or not meeting eligibility criteria (n = 3). Overall participants were psychologically well; anxiety was higher than in the general population [33] and fear of cancer recurrence was high (M = 17.61, SD = 6.14) with 32% of participants meeting the consensus FCR clinical cut off (> 22) [34]. Based on the framework analysis, four distinct themes emerged from the interviews: (1) late effects awareness, (2) framing and coping, (3) uncertainty and (4) management.

Conclusion
Introduction
Participants
Late Effects Awareness
Framing and Coping with Late Effects
Uncertainty about Late Effects
Management of Late Effects
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call