Abstract

Referring to the principle of uti possidetis juris, the establishment of the boundary line on Sebatik Island was based on a previous agreement between the Netherlands and the British. It was stated in the 1915 Agreement between the Netherlands and the British, which declared that the boundary line follows a parallel line of 4º10' North Latitude. Unfortunately, The Boundary Agreement of 1915 does not mention the datum and reference ellipsoid used to determine the abovementioned 4° 10' North Latitude. The absence of a datum and reference ellipsoid causes disputes in determining the precise location of boundary pillars during the field reconstruction procedure. A joint survey between Indonesia and Malaysia in 1983 found that most of the boundary pillars on Sebatik Island were not precisely located along the 4° 10' North Latitude line and based on the results of the 10th meeting of the Joint Working Group on the Outstanding Boundary Problems in 2018, Indonesia and Malaysia agreed to re-demarcate the boundary, which was carried out in 2019. This study aims to determine the impact of the 2019 re-demarcation of the boundary line between Indonesia and Malaysia on Sebatik Island. The methods applied in this research are in-depth interviews, observation, and document studies. The results found that the 2019 re-demarcation resulted in exchanging areas between Indonesia and Malaysia. This area exchange generates uncertainty about land ownership by citizens in border zones.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.