Abstract

Stanisław Leśniewski’s mereology was originally conceived as a theory of foundations of mathematics and it is also for this reason that it has philosophical connotations. The ‘philosophical significance’ of mereology was upheld by Bolesław Sobociński who expressed the view in his correspondence with J.M. Bocheński. As he wrote to Bocheński in 1948: “[...] it is interesting that, being such a simple deductive theory, mereology may prove a number of very general theses reminiscent of metaphysical ontology”. The theses which Sobociński had in mind were related to the mereological notion of “the Universe”. Sobociński listed them in the letter adding his philosophical commentary but he did not give proofs for them and did not specify precisely the theory lying behind them. This is what we want to supply in the first part of our paper. We indicate some connections between the notion of the universe and other specific mereological notions. Motivated by Sobociński’s informal suggestions showing his preference for mereology over the axiomatic set theory in application to philosophy we propose to consider Sobociński’s formalism in a new frame which is the ZFM theory—an extension of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory by mereological axioms, developed by A. Pietruszczak. In this systematic part we investigate reasons of ’philosophical hopes’ mentioned by Sobociński, pinned on the mereological concept of “the Universe”.

Highlights

  • There is definitely some scepticism as to whether it is possible to establish the so-called intended interpretation of a formalized theory

  • The ‘philosophical significance’ of mereology was upheld by Bolesław Sobociński who expressed the view in his correspondence with

  • We focus on the deductive minimum for the mereological theses listed by Sobociński and indicate some connections between the notion of the universe and other specific mereological notions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is definitely some scepticism as to whether it is possible to establish the so-called intended interpretation of a formalized theory. Sobociński listed them in the letter adding his philosophical commentary He did not give proofs for them and did not define precisely the theory lying behind them. In the considered letter Sobociński expressed his preference for mereology over the axiomatic set theory in application to philosophy, This motivates us to look for a frame in which both mereological and set theoretical notions may be expressed. We choose for this aim the ZFM system, which is an extension of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory by mereological axioms, developed by A. Mentioned by Sobociński, pinned on the mereological concept of “the Universe”

The Universe in Mereology with Ontology
Universes in ZFM
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call