The unity of the legal space: national and international principles

Abstract

The article examines the concept of “legal space” as a frequently used concept in legal literature and mass media. The author analyzes the existing interpretations and semantic loads of the concept, which reveal the functional possibilities of the term “legal space”.
 It has been established that, in the context of ensuring the unity of the legal space in our country, especially after the military invasion of the territory of Ukraine by the Russian Federation and the occupation of its separate territories, it can be stated that: firstly, the courts are quite rightly given the opportunity to apply the named general “Namibian exceptions”, in in the context of at least “registration of births, deaths and marriages” issued by institutions located in the occupied territory, together with other evidence, as establishing possible facts, since the establishment of these facts is essential for the realization of a number of human rights (citizen of Ukraine). Secondly, the terminology of human rights as an open system is simultaneously included in the terminology of international and domestic law, which makes the problem of its unification particularly relevant. Compilation of dictionaries of human rights terms (interpretive bilingual or multilingual, the main purpose of which would be to provide practical assistance to specialists and scientists who deal with human rights, work with international legal acts on human rights, teachers and students) would contribute to solving this problem universities, as well as to a wide range of readers, since human rights terms belong to those legal terms that are most often used by people in everyday life and are common to people of the whole world. At the same time, it is especially important to avoid the use of “calligraphic” and “transliterations” from the Russian language as the language of the aggressor.