Abstract
To the Editor. —Dr Glaser 1 believes that market-based approaches to health care reform will not succeed and, therefore, that the United States should adopt an all-payer, payroll-tax-financed health system. However, he fails to note many of the drawbacks and limitations of this proposal. First, as with all payroll taxes, his plan is fundamentally regressive and thus, to many, unfair. Enacting a new payroll tax to finance health care would result in both high and low wage earners' paying the same tax rates for health care. Second, higher payroll taxes will force the price of labor up. Employers will have to absorb some of these new costs, but most of them will be passed on to employees. As a result, adopting an all-payer system will lead to higher levels of unemployment, to more business failures, and to reductions in wages. Some econometric models predict that adopting a modest 7% payroll
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
