Abstract
Abstract covid-19 has prompted a range of new suggestions to reform the existing international system. One recommendation garnering political support has been to create a new Global Health Threats Council, comprised of heads of state, to facilitate sustained political commitment and investment in pandemic preparedness and response. A question that currently remains unanswered, however, is how and where this new body aligns to existing governance arrangements. Some observers have suggested the new body should report the United Nations Security Council on the basis it is charged with maintaining international peace and security. This paper evaluates the UN Security Council’s engagement with health crises over recent decades to consider the legal, political, and practical feasibility of the body assuming a larger role in responding to future disease events, and the appropriateness of the proposed Global Health Threats Council falling under the authority of the UN’s principal organ for international security.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.