Abstract

2003 marked a year of significant change in the political landscape, particularly for the Canadian right. After ten years of division, the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada (PCs) and the Canadian Alliance united to create the Conservative Party of Canada. This union required a balancing of the interests of both of its founding parties who, on certain issues, espoused very different views. One important example of this was social conservatism. In this paper, the author examines the new party’s attempt to balance the two parties’ differing opinions on social conservatism. In order to accomplish this, the paper first examines the differences between the two parties, and then examines how conflicting interests were resolved under the banner of the ‘New Conservative Party.’ The author concludes that by deliberately declarin socially conservative issues beyond the scope of party policy, the new conservative party has been able to strike a balance between the interests of the voting population and the interests of its more socially conservative members, who are able to express their preferences by means of a free vote.

Highlights

  • The Unite the Right Movement The movement to unite the Canadian right grew out of a separation of the Canadian right fifteen years earlier

  • For the purposes of this paper the Reform Party and the Canadian Alliance will be treated as a one party, as the Reform Party would be replaced by the Canadian Alliance in 2000

  • This essay will argue that the approach of Reform/Canadian Alliance and Progressive Conservatives to social conservatism was extremely different, and though the Conservative government has followed the example of the PCs, they have still been able to broker the interests of their social conservative members

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Unite the Right Movement The movement to unite the Canadian right grew out of a separation of the Canadian right fifteen years earlier. This essay will argue that the approach of Reform/Canadian Alliance and Progressive Conservatives to social conservatism was extremely different, and though the Conservative government has followed the example of the PCs, they have still been able to broker the interests of their social conservative members.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call