Abstract

The Utrecht Law Review is an open-access peer-reviewed journal which aims to offer an international academic platform for cross-border legal research. In the first place, this concerns research in which the boundaries of the classic branches of the law (private law, criminal law, constitutional and administrative law, European and public international law) are crossed and connections are made between these areas of the law, amongst others from a comparative law perspective. In addition, the journal welcomes research in which classic law is brought face to face with not strictly legal disciplines such as philosophy, economics, political sciences and public administration science.The journal was established in 2005 and is affiliated to the Utrecht University School of Law. If you wish to receive e-mail alerts please join the mailing list.

Highlights

  • The Lisbon Treaty states that the Union shall respect cultural diversity and national identity

  • The principles of subsidiarity and conferral are essential in the creation of powers for the Union, some of its institutions seem to express a progressive approach toward the development of a more centralised political entity, meaning that increasingly more powers would be exercised at the European Union level with less Member State sovereignty and autonomy

  • Divergent perspectives exist on the nature of the Lisbon Treaty: is it merely an amendment treaty or is it a step towards a ‘new Union’? And, more importantly, how does the Union combine these ideals with the statement that cultural diversity and national identity will be respected?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Lisbon Treaty states that the Union shall respect cultural diversity and national identity. These actions seem to send out a progressive signal toward European integration by increasing the Union’s powers This is where Euroscepticism comes in: to what extent can the novelties under the Lisbon Treaties be evaluated in the light of some major Eurosceptic arguments opposing further European integration? Taking the foregoing questions as a guideline, this contribution provides a critical and normative observation of several essential developments and changes in relation to cultural diversity and national identity.

Diversity and the Union’s desire: towards a transfer of powers?
New competences
52. Title I
New procedures
Council of Ministers
Findings
Final remarks – Promises under the Lisbon Treaty: giving in to Euroscepticism?
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.