Abstract
AbstractMost commonly used second‐order‐accurate, dissipative time integration algorithms for structural dynamics possess a spurious root. For an algorithm to be accurate, it has been suggested that the spurious root must be small and ideally be zero in the low‐frequency limit. In the paper we show that good accuracy can be achieved even if the spurious root does not tend towards zero in the low‐frequency limit. This permits more flexibility in the design of time integration algorithms. As an example, we present an algorithm that has greater accuracy than several other dissipative algorithms even though for all frequencies its spurious root is non‐zero. We also show that the degraded performance of the Bazzi‐ρ algorithm is not due to its non‐zero spurious root.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
