Abstract
Adopted on September 8 of 2000, the United Nations Millennium Declaration stated as its first goal that countries [further] resolve to halve, by the year 2015, the proportion of the world's people whose income is less than one dollar a day and the proportion of people who suffer from hunger Each country committed to achieve the stated goal, regardless of their initial conditions in terms of poverty and inequality levels. This paper presents a framework to quantify how much initial conditions affect poverty reduction, given a level of effort (growth). The framework used in the analysis allows for the growth elasticity of poverty to vary according to changes in the income distribution along the dynamic path of growth and redistribution, unlike previous examples in the literature where this is assumed to be constant. While wealthier countries did perform better in reducing poverty in the last decade and the half (1995-2008), assuming equal initial conditions, the situation reverses: we find a statistically significant negative relation between initial average income and poverty reduction performance, with the poorest countries in the sample going from the worse to the best performers in poverty reduction. The analysis also quantifies how much poorer countries would have scored better, had they had the same level of initial average income as wealthier countries. The results suggest a remarkable change in poverty reduction performance, in addition to the reversal of ranks from worse to best performers. The application of this framework goes beyond poverty targets and the Millennium Development Goals. Given the widespread use of targets to determine resource allocation, in education, health, or decentralized social expenditures, it constitutes a helpful tool to measure policy performance towards all kinds of goals. The proposed framework can be useful to evaluate the importance of initial conditions on outcomes, for a wide array of policies.
Highlights
Adopted on September 8 of 2000, the United Nations Millennium Declaration stated as its first goal that countries “...[further] resolve to halve, by the year 2015, the proportion of the world’s people whose income is less than one dollar a day and the proportion of people who suffer from hunger...” (General Assembly resolution 55/2)
The results suggest a remarkable change in poverty reduction performance: while wealthier countries did perform better in reducing poverty in the last decade and the half (1995-2008), assuming equal initial conditions, we find the poorest countries in the sample going from the worse to the best performers in poverty reduction
Our first exercise is to assess how ranks in poverty reduction performance are affected by the assumption of equal initial conditions across countries
Summary
Adopted on September 8 of 2000, the United Nations Millennium Declaration stated as its first goal that countries “...[further] resolve to halve, by the year 2015, the proportion of the world’s people whose income is less than one dollar a day and the proportion of people who suffer from hunger...” (General Assembly resolution 55/2). The target of halving extreme poverty between 1990 and 2015 is on track to being met. The target will be met mainly due to the impressive poverty reduction achievements in Southeast Asia. Between 1990 and 2008, Southeast Asia reduced extreme poverty from 45 percent of the population to 17 percent. Looking at China alone, the progress is even more remarkable, with extreme poverty falling from 60 percent in 1990 to 13 percent in 2008. On the other extreme, during the same period, SubSaharan Africa reduced its extreme poverty by a modest 9 percentage points, from 56 to 47 percent
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.