Abstract

Purpose: Safety net health services, such as federally funded health clinics, are interventions that aim to mitigate inequality in resource distribution, thus primarily clustered in poor areas with lack of access to health care. However, not all neighborhoods with the most needs benefit from safety net health services. In this article, we explore the distribution of a federally funded health service intervention designed to serve impoverished areas, the medically underserved areas (MUAs), and the relationship between MUA designation and neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics.Methods: We explore the spatial distribution of MUAs. The 2010 U.S. census data including 868 census tracts in Chicago were used for the analysis. We then examined the likelihood of being designated as an MUA using census tract level neighborhood demographic variables.Results: We found that the likelihood of obtaining MUA designation increases for neighborhoods with higher levels of poverty, the likelihood of being designated as an MUA begins to decline beyond the tipping point, whereas the proportion of black residents continues to increase. In census tracts that were eligible but not designated, there was a greater proportion of black residents compared with white residents (p<0.01). The census tracks also had higher mean disadvantage scores (p<0.01) and lower social capital (p<0.01). Furthermore, MUA eligible areas that were not designated as MUAs were predominantly black neighborhoods in poverty.Conclusion: Studies have documented that receiving MUA designation substantially reduces disparities in access to health care, and yet, our study finding indicates that the most racially segregated poor neighborhoods are excluded from the benefits of having such federal health safety net program. Seemingly race-neutral safety net health services may still be distributed in a way that perpetuates racial inequality in health.

Highlights

  • Safety net programs and social capitalSafety net programs are, by design, located in underserved areas to provide necessary services for those who lack access to resources.[1]

  • We found that the likelihood of obtaining medically underserved areas (MUAs) designation increases for neighborhoods with higher levels of poverty, the likelihood of being designated as an MUA begins to decline beyond the tipping point, whereas the proportion of black residents continues to increase

  • The 87 census tracts that were eligible for MUA status (IMU scores: 48.6–61.7) but not designated as an MUA were predominantly on the south side of Chicago

Read more

Summary

Introduction

By design, located in underserved areas to provide necessary services for those who lack access to resources.[1] overall safety net programs have declined in the neoliberal era,[2,3] welfare services continue to mitigate the uneven spatial distribution of resources. Small and Stark document that the likelihood of having public childcare centers, a safety net program, was higher in poor neighborhoods, compared with affluent neighborhoods.[1]. Safety net programs are typically delivered through local service providers.[4,5] Unlike individual cash assistance programs such as food stamps, social service programs are place based.[4] safety net programs represent neighborhood institutions that shape how Divisions of 1Health Policy and Administration and 2Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Departments of 4Sociology and 5Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call