Abstract

Using detailed product-level data in the retail sector in the United States from 2004 to 2013, I find that product innovations disproportionately benefited high-income households due to the endogenous response of supply to shifts in demand, which amplified inequality. My analysis consists of two parts. In the measurement part, I show that annual quality-adjusted inflation was 0.66 percentage points lower for high-income households, relative to low-income households. This gap resulted from both lower inflation on continuing products and a faster increase in product variety for the high income. In the mechanism part, I use national and local changes in demand that are plausibly exogenous to supply factors - from shifts in the national income and age distributions over time, and from food stamp policy changes across states - to provide causal evidence that a shock to the relative demand for goods (1) affects the direction of product innovations, and (2) leads to a decrease in the relative price of the goods for which demand became relatively larger (i.e. the long-term supply curve is downward sloping). Calibrations show that this channel explains most of the observed difference in quality-adjusted inflation rates across income groups. I find support for the external validity of these findings by using more aggregate data on the full consumption basket of American households back to 1953.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call