Abstract
Most combatants in armed conflict are men, so naturally men are the major direct victims of military operations+ Yet armed conflicts have important indi- rect negative consequences on agriculture, infrastructure, public health provision, and social order+ These indirect consequences are often overlooked and underappreci- ated+ They also affect women—arguably more so than men+ This article provides the first rigorous analysis of the impact of armed conflict on female life expectancy rel- ative to male+ We find that over the entire conflict period, interstate and civil wars on average affect women more adversely than men+ In peacetime, women typically live longer than men+ Hence, armed conflict tends to decrease the gap between female and male life expectancy+ For civil wars, we also find that ethnic wars and wars in failed states are much more damaging to women than other civil wars+ Our find- ings challenge policymakers as well as international and humanitarian organizations to develop policies that tackle the large indirect and long-term negative health impacts of armed conflicts+
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
