Abstract

Although taken for granted today by people and by some experts, the unconscious has never been experimentally demonstrated. Even for the psychoanalysts, the unconscious is nothing more than a model. The unconscious, if anything, is normally obscured by conscious activities and can only express itself in response to conditions leading to non-ordinary mental expressions, for instance during hypnosis. For many years, we have been using hypnosis in variegating experimental setting, and we think one of the evidences coming from our tests is the experimental demonstration that the unconscious exists and can be forced to respond to solicitations the participant is not aware of. We administered hypnotic suggestions to highly-hypnotizable normal participants with the aim of inducing hallucination of body heating, alexia, amusia, spatial neglect, focused analgesia, general anaesthesia, and age regression. Following such suggestions, participants actually experienced a sensation of heat, incapability to read, lack of interest in a side of the world, indifference to painful stimuli, and revivification of infantile age, respectively. But this is not all. Through the above-mentioned suggestions we also obtained some physical reactions that could only be defined as unconscious, i.e. increase of the stroke volume and of the mesenteric artery flow following hallucinated body heating, reduction of reaction times to incongruent color words in a Stroop task following alexia, prolongation of ipsilateral reaction times following spatial neglect, reduction of mismatch negativity to deviant stimuli following hypnotic amusia, coherent modifications of the sympathetic/parasympathetic balance to trigeminal and non-trigeminal pain during analgesia and anaesthesia, reduction of Raven score and Raven-induced stress during age regression. These responses evoked during hypnosis in response to mental images are clearly non-voluntary and non-conscious, and demonstrate in experimental setting with the tools that are typical of human physiology—the existence of unconscious to perceive and react.

Highlights

  • The Unconscious—Creed or Evidence?The existence of the unconscious is taken for granted by common people

  • It must be clarified that a mental image becoming plastic (Barnier & McConkey, 1999) is the crucial point in experimental hypnosis aimed at demonstrating the unconscious, as it guarantees that the effects observed in experimental setting, if any, are not mere automatic neurovegetative responses, but the consequence of the superior mental activity of Homo sapiens

  • An hypothesis is proposed regarding an objective, and a procedure based on hypnotism is arranged to confirm or deny the hypothesis: induction of hypnosis is followed by a phase of neutral hypnosis, a mental image potentially able to induce a physical modification that is notoriously out of voluntary control is suggested

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The existence of the unconscious is taken for granted by common people. Psychoanalysis gave a great impulse to the belief that the unconscious exists. It must be clarified that a mental image becoming plastic (Barnier & McConkey, 1999) is the crucial point in experimental hypnosis aimed at demonstrating the unconscious, as it guarantees that the effects observed in experimental setting, if any, are not mere automatic neurovegetative responses, but the consequence of the superior mental activity of Homo sapiens The medium producing such responses (a medium that is non-conscious) must have, in turn, the characteristics of reality. A limited number of authors are using hypnotism as a tool to study experimentally some aspects of human mind It has recently been demonstrated with imaging techniques that hypnotic paralysis and arm levitation following hypnotic suggestions are real and are accompanied by (or are perhaps produced by) a modified representation of the self impacting motor abilities (Burgmer et al, 2013; Cojan et al, 2009); the precuneus could play a pivotal role in producing (Casiglia et al, 2012a) and maintaining (Pyka et al, 2011) the particular mind state called hypnosis, making possible unconscious motor modifications. Neuroimaging (Casiglia et al, 2010, 2012; Priftis et al, 2011) is not the only tool used by our research group, being our research activity based on functional tests and on cardiovascular measurements

Important Premises
Model 1
Model 3
Model 4
Model 6
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call