Abstract

The last decades have been characterised by fundamental changes - a paradigm shift - in organisation theory, management theory and the intellectual constructions through which organisations, managers and individuals working in organisations are understood. The value system of society has been changing, and this has had effects on leadership. Up until recently, the dominant model for leadership has been one which stresses simplicity, order, determinism and linearity. Consequently, today's leaders in the West manifest a moderate tolerance of unequal power distribution in organisations. However, this model has increasingly been coming under fire from conflicting perspectives, for example, new approaches stress complexity, bounded disorder, non-determinism and non-linearity. Under the Eastern and African influences, they also show a shift from the most individualistic approaches to group/team approaches to problem solving. Additionally, strong 'masculine' values, including traits such as aggressiveness, independence and insensitivity to feelings, have been changing moderately to relationship-building, interdependence and concern for others. In the workplace, there appears to be a move away from valuing economic incentives, organisational loyalty and work-related identity and towards valuing more meaningful work, pursuit of leisure, personal identity and self-fulfilment. The modern leader must, hence, be able to recognise value differences and trends among people at work in order to lead them accordingly. This article looks at the plurality of the dilemmas leaders are facing, as we enter the 21st century, because of the multiple realities and perspectives that they have to act out and reflect within the workplace and society.

Highlights

  • Much of the current human resource literature tells us that effective leadership is focused on finding the solutions for the future that resides collectively in the organisation and enabling them to be implemented

  • When you try to build a coresponsible team, a team that can take on change and challenge with a positive nature and a shared vision, you must examine your basic beliefs and leadership styles - and therein lies the seeds for confusion

  • Many explanations may be sought for paradox. incongruity and tensions within literature on leadership and how leadership is played out in reality

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Much of the current human resource literature tells us that effective leadership is focused on finding the solutions for the future that resides collectively in the organisation and enabling them to be implemented. This requires, at all levels, living with substantial ambiguity and uncertainty and being comfortable with it. Possible explanations may include: (a) a reflection of frame-breaking transitions in paradigms on organisational behaviour and, more broadly, world consciousness in transition; or (b) reflection of the inherently paradoxical nature of leadership and human existence itself. This article will introduce the notion of paradox in leadership theory and practice, and will explore some of the incongruities, tensions and paradoxes within the emergent leadership paradigms of the West. The article will conclude with a few reflections on the future of leadership theory, taking into consideration the incongruities, tensions and paradoxes identified therein

Notion of paradox within leadership theory and practice
Circumstances Connected Leader
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call