Abstract

BackgroundThe UK is a major provider of official development assistance (ODA) to low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). The UK recently announced that 102 countries and territories would not receive an ODA budget for the 2021–22 year. Given that the UK is the second largest health ODA donor, these cuts could have serious implications for health systems in LMICs. We aimed to understand how these cuts might affect financing for health systems in countries receiving UK aid. MethodsWe analysed domestic and external funding for 134 countries that received UK ODA in 2019–20 that had data available. Our goal was to understand the differences between countries that will continue to receive aid in 2020–21 (termed budget safe, n=34) and those that will not (termed budget cut, n=100) and quantify the role the UK plays in financing health systems among both cohorts. Findings53 (53%) of 100 budget-cut countries are LMICs, and sub-Saharan Africa is the region with the largest share (27 countries [27%]). The UK makes up less than 10% of health ODA for almost all budget-cut countries (95 [95%]). The health systems of two budget-cut countries in particular might be faced with financing challenges given their high ratios of UK health aid to domestic government health expenditures: The Gambia (1·24:1) and Eritrea (0·33:1). Although most budget-safe countries are LMICs (26 [76%]), a quarter (eight [24%]) are upper-middle-income or high-income, signalling the geostrategic importance of some wealthier countries to the new UK aid agency. The UK is a large health donor among budget-safe countries: it contributes more than 10% of the health ODA budget in 11 (32%) of 34 countries. Many low-income budget-safe countries in sub-Saharan Africa also exhibit high ratios of UK health ODA to domestic government health expenditures (eg, South Sudan [3·15:1], Sierra Leone [0·48:1], and the Democratic Republic of the Congo [0·34:1]). InterpretationThe 2021–22 UK budget cuts might not be as catastrophic for as many health systems as expected, although some countries might be affected more than others. The UK is a major player in most budget-safe countries, and several countries, particularly low-income countries in sub-Saharan Africa, show high ratios of reliance on UK health aid. Our analysis focused on financing for health systems, but we did not consider the potential effect on funding cuts to health outcomes, analysed potential country responses to these cuts, or propose mechanisms for closing funding gaps. FundingNone.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.