Abstract

Monumentality is the cornerstone of modern tourism. It specifically depends on the physical heritage, but people’s conception of cultural landscapes is usually very abstract and non-physical. These experiences can include narratives of place used to map spaces cosmologically. In Africa, the focus on materiality alienates communities from their heritage and creates conflicts between the heritage managers and stakeholder communities. Using Great Zimbabwe, this chapter shows that monumentality is not the cornerstone of memory, nor is it the only way to understand a cultural landscape. Great Zimbabwe’s designation as a ‘site’ relegates community concerns and promotes political and tourist needs. Focusing on the visual does not assist heritage managers in preserving a landscape that is also sacred. Sacredness is preserved through the respect of the community’s interpretations of the landscape as well as the soundscapes that they associate with the place. Managing such sacred landscapes as ‘archaeological sites’ eliminates the sentient nature of the place.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.