Abstract
Fiscal efficiency and organizational effectiveness were the primary objectives that underpinned the reform of educational administration in New Zealand in the late 1980s. The consequent re-organization of schools and schooling located responsibility and accountability for school performance, teachers' work and student outcomes firmly at the door of local schools. The response from schools, as this article reports, was to devise bureaucratic solutions to deal with a complex mix of new tasks that were created; this included marketing, financial management, human resources management and strategic planning. One of the unintended consequences was schools increasingly became hierarchical and this invariably placed some teachers in roles of authority over others. Although terms such as `senior manager', `middle manager' or `middle leader' have been variously used to describe these roles, an empirical project conducted in three New Zealand secondary schools reveals that management tasks and activities dominate teachers' work and that there is, consequently, little or no time for leadership. In the words of one participant `the tyranny of bureaucracy leaves little time for leadership'.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Educational Management Administration & Leadership
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
