Abstract

There is a tendency to assume that medical science, medical research, and medical practice are identical, or worse, hierarchically arranged. Medical practice does operate under the umbrella of medical science, but medical practitioners do not take practice directives from medical researchers. In conceptualizing and promoting a notion of medical consensus that is different from scientific certainty, the National Institutes of Health has taken a giant step toward bridging the gap between research and practice, but the task is a tough one. My vantage point is from personal interviews with more than 300 mostly nonacademic practicing physicians in three countries who described adoption of new medical technology. 1-3 The first step in conceptualizing the relationship between science and practice should be to reject the idea that practitioners are merely slow scientists. Just as science is not practice, practice is not merely applied science. Different purposes lead to different activities, associations, information,

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.