The twilight of sun‐animalcules

Abstract

Molecular sampling of the taxonomic diversity of the living world is nowadays a task of paramount importance. Heliozoa represents one of the major eukaryotic taxa, which remain significantly underrepresented in molecular databases. The term Heliozoa was coined to embrace organisms with a rounded body and stiff pseudopodia. Despite evidences from ultrastructural studies, which conclusively show the polyphyly of selected heliozoan groups, contemporary morphological systems retain Heliozoa as a monophyletic taxon. From the perspective of reconstructing the true phylogeny of Eukaryota, molecular approaches to analyse relationships within this large protist group are evidently necessary. Phylogenetic analysis of our data shows that the four heliozoan taxa branch either independently or within different eukaryotic phyla. The actinophryids (Actinosphaerium, Actinophrys) appear as a lineage of stramenopiles, while the desmothoracids (Clathrulina, Hedriocystis) branch within “core Cercozoa”. The position of both groups is strongly supported in all analyses and is congruent with ultrastructure‐based taxonomic revisions. The centrohelids (Chlamydaster, Heterophrys, Pterocystis, and Raphidiophrys) do not seem to be related to any particular eukaryotic phylum, in agreement with a recent molecular study. The taxopodid Sticholonche was found to branch between Polycystinea and Acantharea, two classes of radiolarians. Results obtained in this study suggest that the heliozoan body form cannot be used as a diagnostic argument to unite Heliozoa. Instead, we discriminate between the three heliomorphic taxa of independent origin, Actinophryida, Desmothoracida and Sticholonche, and propose the novel higher rank taxon Centrohelida. The term Heliozoa should thus be used solely in historical context.