The Turing mechanism in vertebrate limb patterning

Abstract

In the Review ‘Making digit patterns in the vertebrate limb’ 1 , Cheryll Tickle discusses evidence that the long-standing concept of ‘positional information’ — which was formulated to account for differences in the appearance of distinct skeletal elements — is inadequate to explain the number and arrangement of such elements. As an alternative means for laying out the overall template for the limb skeleton, she briefly mentions an entirely different mechanism of pattern formation: the reaction–diffusion model, which was originally put forward by the mathematician A.M. Turing 2 . As Tickle states, “The series of many unpatterned digits, which develop in the absence of GLI3 function in mouse mutants, is reminiscent of the digit pre-pattern that has been proposed to function in combination with the morphogen gradient [3] . According to this proposal, a series of digit condensations, a pre-pattern, is specified by a wave-like distribution of a morphogen that is generated by a reaction–diffusion mechanism, with the peaks corresponding to the condensations. A gradient of another morphogen … then provides each peak with a positional value and a digit identity. The number of peaks that are generated by the reaction–diffusion mechanism depends on the width of the limb.” The proposal that the limb skeleton is generated by a reaction–diffusion mechanism, with other morphogen gradients having a fine-tuning role, was first made not in the 1989 review 3 that she cites, but a decade previously, in conjunction with a specific model for the production of patterns of pre-cartilage condensation through the inter action of mesenchymal cells with morpho gens and with the extracellular matrix (ECM) 4 . More importantly, Tickle failed to describe research in the ensuing three decades that has seriously considered, tested and elaborated on the role of reaction– diffusion patterning in limb development. This includes a series of papers by Takashi Miura and his colleagues that provided evidence for a reaction–diffusion mechanism over a mechanochemical alternative in an in vitro model for pre-chondrogenic pattern formation 5 , and for the functionality of transforming growth factor-β2 (TGFβ2) as the activator in a reaction–diffusion scheme 6 . Later, it was demonstrated that lateral inhibition of limb pre-cartilage condensation (a necessary component of the reaction–diffusion framework) was induced by ectodermally produced fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) 7 . This was followed by a reaction–diffusion-based mathematical analysis 8 that accounted for the coordinate effects of FGFs in laterally inhibiting and accelerating the rate of appearance of foci of pre-cartilage condensation. Miura and co-workers also showed that the peculiar ‘thick–thin’ morphology of limb skeletal elements that is observed in doublefoot-mutant mice could be understood by assuming that a reaction–diffusion mechanism underlies skeletal patterning 9 . In the original reaction–diffusion-based limb model, the hypothesis that the nondiffusible ECM protein fibronectin mediates pre-cartilage condensation as part of a regulatory circuit that involves diffusible morphogens 4