Abstract

Abstract. As part of the Tropical Forest and Fire Emissions Experiment (TROFFEE), tropical forest fuels were burned in a large, biomass-fire simulation facility and the smoke was characterized with open-path Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), proton-transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS), gas chromatography (GC), GC/PTR-MS, and filter sampling of the particles. In most cases, about one-third of the fuel chlorine ended up in the particles and about one-half remained in the ash. About 50% of the mass of non-methane organic compounds (NMOC) emitted by these fires could be identified with the available instrumentation. The lab fire emission factors (EF, g compound emitted per kg dry fuel burned) were coupled with EF obtained during the TROFFEE airborne and ground-based field campaigns. This revealed several types of EF dependence on parameters such as the ratio of flaming to smoldering combustion and fuel characteristics. The synthesis of data from the different TROFFEE platforms was also used to derive EF for all the measured species for both primary deforestation fires and pasture maintenance fires – the two main types of biomass burning in the Amazon. Many of the EF are larger than those in widely-used earlier work. This is mostly due to the inclusion of newly-available, large EF for the initially-unlofted smoldering emissions from residual logs in pastures and the assumption that these emissions make a significant contribution (~40%) to the total emissions from pasture fires. The TROFFEE EF for particles with aerodynamic diameter <2.5 microns (EFPM2.5) is 14.8 g/kg for primary deforestation fires and 18.7 g/kg for pasture maintenance fires. These EFPM2.5 are significantly larger than a previous recommendation (9.1 g/kg) and lead to an estimated pyrogenic primary PM2.5 source for the Amazon that is 84% larger. New regional budgets for biogenic and pyrogenic emissions were roughly estimated. Coupled with an estimate of secondary aerosol formation in the Amazon and source apportionment studies, the regional budgets suggest that ~5% of the total mass of the regionally generated NMOC end up as secondary organic aerosol within the Amazonian boundary layer within 1–3 days. New global budgets confirm that biogenic emissions and biomass burning are the two largest global sources of NMOC with an estimated production of approximately 1000 (770–1400) and 500 (250–630) Tg/yr, respectively. It follows that plants and fires may also be the two main global sources of secondary organic aerosol. A limited set of emission ratios (ER) is given for sugar cane burning, which may help estimate the air quality impacts of burning this major crop, which is often grown in densely populated areas.

Highlights

  • Biomass burning and biogenic emissions are the two largest sources of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and fine particulate carbon in the global troposphere

  • The Tropical Forest and Fire Emissions Experiment (TROFFEE) used new instrumentation to quantify the emissions from tropical deforestation fires and tropical vegetation in laboratory experiments (October 2003) and airborne and ground based field campaigns during the 2004 Amazonian dry season

  • The sum of NH3+NOx is within the range of previous observations and these data are potentially consistent with an accounting for all the fuel nitrogen as discussed in detail by Goode et al (1999)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biomass burning and biogenic emissions are the two largest sources of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and fine particulate carbon in the global troposphere. The Tropical Forest and Fire Emissions Experiment (TROFFEE) used new instrumentation to quantify the emissions from tropical deforestation fires and tropical vegetation in laboratory experiments (October 2003) and airborne and ground based field campaigns during the 2004 Amazonian dry season (see Yokelson et al, 2007a, for an overview). A very serious disadvantage of laboratory fire simulations is the possibility that the lab fire emissions are different from fire emissions produced in the field This is especially critical for tropical forest fuels as it is impractical to burn a diverse suite of large diameter tropical logs in the lab. The laboratory experiment involved measuring the emissions from 32 fires that burned tropical forest fuels and a few other fuels (e.g. sugar cane, pine needles, and savanna grass).

Combustion facility
Fuel types and characterization
Open-path FTIR
PTR-MS
Calculation of modified combustion efficiency and emission factors
Results
N2 SO2
Impact of major trace gas and particle sources in the Amazon basin
New global estimates of biogenic and pyrogenic NMOC
Sugar cane
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.