Abstract

A triple GEM detector for low energy neutrons and high rejection of gamma background was tested at the CERF facility at CERN as stray neutron monitor. The detector was exposed to a wide neutron spectrum generated by a 120 GeV/c positively charged hadron beam hitting a copper target. The beam particle rate on target ranged over three orders of magnitude. The neutron count rate measured with the GEM could be linearly correlated with the beam intensity and also compared well with Monte Carlo simulations. The detector performance suggests that it can be used as an independent low energy neutron monitor at high-energy particle accelerator facilities.

Highlights

  • A triple GEM detector for low energy neutrons and high rejection of gamma background was tested at the CERF facility at CERN as stray neutron monitor

  • The experimental conditions inside the CERF target area were simulated in the past by Vincke et al [13] with the FLUKA Monte Carlo code [14, 15], in order to study the response of six air-filled ionization chambers for radiation protection applications

  • A Triple GEM detector had previously been tested as in-beam monitor of relativistic hadron beams [17]

Read more

Summary

The triple GEM detector for low energy neutrons

The detector, described in detail in previous studies [7], has an active area of 5 × 5 cm and filled with Ar/CO2 (70/30) gas mixture (figure 1). The charged particles highly ionize the gas mixture in the drift region of the detector producing secondary electrons (figure 2). These electrons drift reaching the three GEM foils where they are multiplied and produce a detectable signal in the induction gap. This multilayer structure offers higher conversion efficiency than a single layer, because there is higher probability of neutron interaction. The threshold set by the FPGA board to the CARIOCA chips eliminates all possible sources of electronic noise. The field values applied were 3, 3, 3, 5 kV/cm from drift to induction gap

Experimental setup
Pad multiplicity
High voltage working point
Detected neutron rate
Comparison with FLUKA simulations
Detector activation
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.