Abstract

The ability to predict NO2 concentrations ([NO2]) within urban street networks is important for the evaluation of strategies to reduce exposure to NO2. However, models aiming to make such predictions involve the coupling of several complex processes: traffic emissions under different levels of congestion; dispersion via turbulent mixing; chemical processes of relevance at the street-scale. Parameterisations of these processes are challenging to quantify with precision. Predictions are therefore subject to uncertainties which should be taken into account when using models within decision making. This paper presents an analysis of mean [NO2] predictions from such a complex modelling system applied to a street canyon within the city of York, UK including the treatment of model uncertainties and their causes. The model system consists of a micro-scale traffic simulation and emissions model, and a Reynolds averaged turbulent flow model coupled to a reactive Lagrangian particle dispersion model. The analysis focuses on the sensitivity of predicted in-street increments of [NO2] at different locations in the street to uncertainties in the model inputs. These include physical characteristics such as background wind direction, temperature and background ozone concentrations; traffic parameters such as overall demand and primary NO2 fraction; as well as model parameterisations such as roughness lengths, turbulent time- and length-scales and chemical reaction rate coefficients. Predicted [NO2] is shown to be relatively robust with respect to model parameterisations, although there are significant sensitivities to the activation energy for the reaction NO + O3 as well as the canyon wall roughness length. Under off-peak traffic conditions, demand is the key traffic parameter. Under peak conditions where the network saturates, road-side [NO2] is relatively insensitive to changes in demand and more sensitive to the primary NO2 fraction. The most important physical parameter was found to be the background wind direction. The study highlights the key parameters required for reliable [NO2] estimations suggesting that accurate reference measurements for wind direction should be a critical part of air quality assessments for in-street locations. It also highlights the importance of street scale chemical processes in forming road-side [NO2], particularly for regions of high NOx emissions such as close to traffic queues.

Highlights

  • The ability to predict NO2 concentrations ([NO2]) within urban street networks is important for the evaluation of strategies to reduce exposure to NO2

  • The model system consists of a micro-scale traffic simulation and emissions model, and a Reynolds averaged turbulent flow model coupled to a reactive Lagrangian particle dispersion model

  • European directives to reduce nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from vehicles have been in operation for well over a decade, many urban areas across Europe are still failing to meet the NO2 air quality standards set by the EU Directive 2008/50/EC

Read more

Summary

A Introduction

European directives to reduce NOx emissions from vehicles have been in operation for well over a decade, many urban areas across Europe are still failing to meet the NO2 air quality standards set by the EU Directive 2008/50/EC. A number of modelling approaches have been suggested to address the dispersion part of the problem including Gaussian based models such as OSPM (Operational Street Pollution Model),[6] network models such as SIRANE,[7] and compartment based models where pollutant exchange rates are parameterised according to canyon aspect ratios,[8] as well as high resolution computational uid dynamics (CFD) approaches.[9,10] Several studies have attempted to couple models of the complex turbulent ow with chemical sub-models, albeit for single or small networks of streets.[11,12,13,14,15] These studies have highlighted the in uence of incomplete mixing on the formation of secondary pollutants in regions of high primary NOx emissions This suggests that coarse resolution models (e.g. urban air shed models) are unlikely to be of direct relevance for the study of road-side concentrations and exposure, they may provide boundary conditions for higher resolution studies at the street scale.

B Methodology
 10À5
Findings
D Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.