Abstract

AbstractThis article argues that the rise of transnational regulation has a transformative impact on law. It examines the field of transnational environmental regulation to show that its proliferation challenges the continued appropriateness of representations of law as (i) territorial, (ii) emanating from the state, (iii) composed of a public and private sphere, (iv) constitutive and regulatory in function, and (v) cohesive and regimented. Instead, law is increasingly perceived as (i) delocalized, (ii) flowing from a plurality of sources, (iii) organizationally inchoate, (iv) reflexive and coordinating in function, and (v) polycentric. Together, these shifts in perception amount to a transformation that the article identifies as the transnationalization of law. The article then explores three responses to the transnationalization of law. It distinguishes responses motivated by a desire to reclaim the traditional conception of law from those that seek to reconstruct law at the transnational level and responses that advocate a context-responsive reconceptualization of law. Each response, it will be shown, creates a different set of opportunities for, and challenges to, the relevance of law for transnational regulation.

Highlights

  • This article explores the relationship between transnational regulation and law

  • It examines the field of transnational environmental regulation to show that its proliferation challenges the continued appropriateness of representations of law as (i) territorial, (ii) emanating from the state, (iii) composed of a public and private sphere, (iv) constitutive and regulatory in function, and (v) cohesive and regimented

  • It identifies five dominant perspectives that have shaped our thinking about law and its relation to society: namely, that law (i) is a territorial concept, which (ii) emanates from the state; (iii) it is divided into a public and a private sphere; (iv) it has a constitutive, regulating and communicative function, and (v) is cohesive and comprehensive in its

Read more

Summary

Location

The geographical realm of application of such regional and international regulatory measures formally corresponds with the territory of the signatory states, which functions as an expanded field of jurisdiction Park, ‘Analysis of the Partnership Network in the Clean Development Mechanism’ (2013) 52 Energy Policy, pp. 543–53, at 543

Source
Organization
Function
Structure
Conservative and Defensive
Conservative and Adaptive
Findings
Creative and Adaptive
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call