Abstract

ABSTRACTStudies of manuscripts such as the Trent Codices (I-TRbc87–92) and Bologna Q15 (I-Bc15) have shown that fifteenth-century scribes were not necessarily passive transmitters of the material they copied. Whether motivated by practical constraints or aesthetic preferences, they added, excised and re-composed sections or voices as they saw fit. The frequency and ingenuity of such emendations encourage us to examine them further – not as unwelcome alterations to a putative ‘Urtext’ but as creative acts in their own right.This article focuses on one site of scribal emendation: the concludingAmensections of early fifteenth-century Gloria and Credo settings. Frequently, otherwise concordant sources for the same piece transmitAmensections that appear to be unrelated to each other. I propose that certain types ofAmensettings were more susceptible than others to alteration and that one type – the short, self-contained, homophonicAmen– arose through scribal emendation. In order to describe in precise terms the choices a scribe might make, I introduce a nomenclature system for theAmensettings encountered in this period. Taking a panoptic view of the major sources for sacred polyphony in the first half of the fifteenth century, this article contributes to our understanding of scribal activity and manuscript culture.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.