Abstract
This article is the first to propose that the goals of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, particularly with regard to corporate reinvestment, cannot be achieved without necessary requirements for how repatriated funds are spent in the U.S. This article uses the 2004 tax holiday as an example of a Congressional effort to encourage specific domestic spending through a tax cut. The 2004 tax holiday failed because, among other factors, it did not require multinational corporations to spend repatriated funds on qualified expenditures above and beyond corporations’ levels of pre-tax holiday spending. Ideal requirements for corporations to earn a repatriated income tax deduction would include: an exhaustive list of permissible expenditures, a requirement that spending on permissible expenditures be in excess of pre-tax cut levels of spending, and an enforcement and repayment mechanism for any unearned tax deduction. Parallels can be drawn between the newly enacted transition tax and the 2004 tax holiday. This article discusses the transition tax, and the provisions which end deferral and the worldwide system of taxation without any requirement as to how repatriated funds are spent. The 2004 tax holiday serves as evidence as to how corporations spend repatriated funds following a one-time tax break.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.