Abstract
We consider three-dimensional finite-amplitude thermal convection in a fluid layer with boundaries of finite conductivity. Busse & Riahi (1980) and Proctor (1981) showed that the preferred planform of convection in such a system is a square-cell tesselation provided that the boundaries are much poorer conductors than the fluid, in contrast to the roll solutions which are obtained for perfectly conducting boundaries. We determine here the conductivity of the boundaries at which the preferred planform changes from roll to square-cell type. We show that, for low-Prandtl-number fluids (e.g. mercury), square-cell solutions are realized only when the boundaries are almost insulating; while, for high-Prandtl-number fluids (e.g. silicone oils), square-cell solutions are stable when the boundaries have conductivity comparable to that of the fluid.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.