Abstract
The topic under consideration is the change in the human self understanding in the secular culture, according to Pannenberg, a contemporary thinker of great rational strength. The author poses some questions which underline the ambiguities of secularization and its historical causes. The result has been a new model of man According to Pannenberg, the impact of the (17th- 18th centuries) Modern ideas over the concept of the self has been great. The author highlights the fact that some of Pannenberg ́s arguments are contradictory, because his logic about God does not go beyond the rational sphere, for him the problem of atheism and secularization lies in God inaccessibility, not in man ́s will.
Highlights
Ambiguities of secularization and its historical causes
It is necessary to called “secularization”, and contemporary atheism, ask some questions that highlight the core of the which was a growing and apparently unidirectional problem I wish to address: the ambiguities of the phenomena that has come to modify the vision of man secular process and its relation to the spirit of and cultural awareness inspired by Christianity
Pannenberg inaccessibility is not completely uncovered, its silences disagrees with this thinking, and it is true that continue to defy man, but that does not eliminate the secularization is a product of the modernity project, he human effort to listen him and open ourselves to reality. does not consider them as equivalent processes
Summary
University of Istmo Abstract- The topic under consideration is the change in the human self understanding in the secular culture, according to Pannenberg, a contemporary thinker of great rational strength. The author poses some questions which underline the ambiguities of secularization and its historical causes. The result has been a new model of manAccording to Pannenberg, the impact of the (17th- 18th centuries) Modern ideas over the concept of the self has been great. The author highlights the fact that some of Pannenbergs arguments are contradictory, because his logic about God does not go beyond the rational sphere, for him the problem of atheism and secularization lies in God inaccessibility, not in mans will. As per the compliance and regulations of: Global Journal of Human Social Science (C ) Volume XX Issue VI Version I Year 2020
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
