Abstract
From the middle of the nineteenth century until the first part of the twentieth century contract law was dominated by a school of thought now known as classical contract law. Over the last seventy or eighty years contract law has been transformed from classical to modern. One area of transformation concerns the nature of contract-law reasoning. Reasoning in classical contract law was formal: social propositions played little or no role. In contrast, the objective of modern contract law is to craft rules that are justified by social propositions or, to put it differently, are normatively desirable. The transformation from classical to modern contract law can also be observed through examination of four spectra along which contract-law doctrines can be ranged: from objectivity to subjectivity, from standardization to individualization, from the static to the dynamic, and from binary to multifaceted rules.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.