Abstract

BackgroundThe density of a host population is a key parameter underlying disease transmission, but it also has implications for the expression of disease through its effect on host physiology. In response to higher densities, individuals are predicted to either increase their immune investment in response to the elevated risk of parasitism, or conversely to decrease their immune capacity as a consequence of the stress of a crowded environment. However, an individual’s health is shaped by many different factors, including their genetic background, current environmental conditions, and maternal effects. Indeed, population density is often sensed through the presence of info-chemicals in the environment, which may influence a host’s interaction with parasites, and also those of its offspring. All of which may alter the expression of disease, and potentially uncouple the presumed link between changes in host density and disease outcomes.ResultsIn this study, we used the water flea Daphnia magna and its obligate bacterial parasite Pasteuria ramosa, to investigate how signals of high host density impact on host-parasite interactions over two consecutive generations. We found that the chemical signals from crowded treatments induced phenotypic changes in both the parental and offspring generations. In the absence of a pathogen, life-history changes were genotype-specific, but consistent across generations, even when the signal of density was removed. In contrast, the influence of density on infected animals depended on the trait and generation of exposure. When directly exposed to signals of high-density, host genotypes responded differently in how they minimised the severity of disease. Yet, in the subsequent generation, the influence of density was rarely genotype-specific and instead related to ability of the host to minimise the onset of infection.ConclusionOur findings reveal that population level correlations between host density and infection capture only part of the complex relationship between crowding and the severity of disease. We suggest that besides its role in horizontal transmission, signals of density can influence parasite epidemiology by modifying mechanisms of resistance across multiple generations, and elevating variability via genotype-by-environment interactions. Our results help resolve why some studies are able to find a positive correlation between high density and resistance, while others uncover a negative correlation, or even no direct relationship at all.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0828-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • The density of a host population is a key parameter underlying disease transmission, but it has implications for the expression of disease through its effect on host physiology

  • The response of Daphnia to the manipulated signals of crowding We first examined the impact of low-density and highdensity conditioned water on host body size and fecundity across two generations in the absence of parasitism

  • The direct effects of density signals on host-parasite interactions We found that raising animals in either low-density or high-density conditioned water had little impact on infection rates (Fig. 2a)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The density of a host population is a key parameter underlying disease transmission, but it has implications for the expression of disease through its effect on host physiology. A given host may experience fluctuations in a range of environmental conditions, including food availability and quality, temperature, habitat quality, and predation [1, 2] Anticipating this variability, an individual is able to change his or her own investment in immune defence strategies [3, 4], and bias the investment strategies of their offspring [5, 6]. Both paternal and maternal effects have been shown to have a profound impact on the expression of disease [7,8,9,10]. The crowding stress hypothesis, predicts that hosts living in high-density conditions are more stressed and more vulnerable to infection due to a down regulation of the immune system [20, 21]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call