Abstract

ONE OF THE MOST criticized features of classical Athenian law is the bizarre institution of ia'cavoq, usually translated torture or interrogation under torture. A well-known rule held that in cases1 the testimony of slaves was only admissible in court if it had been taken under torture, and in the surviving forensic speeches the orators frequently describe the rules governing ,adiavog and praise the practice as effective and even most democratic (Lycurg. 1.29). It was a topos that information from a a'cyavog was preferable to the testimony of free witnesses; as one speaker puts it (Dem. 30.37):

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call