Abstract

There are a number of known factors that can affect clinical outcomes and structural healing after rotator cuff repair. Some of these are fixed variables, such as patient age and comorbidities, tear size, and tissue quality, while others, such as patient-related factors like smoking, repair construct, and postoperative management, are modifiable and may allow for improvement in patient outcomes. The traditional school of thought regarding the initiation of postoperative rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair has favored early passive shoulder motion to prevent stiffness. Until recently, this approach has been largely uniform. However, over time, data suggesting poorer tendon healing in certain subsets of patients have accumulated, leading some surgeons to advocate a delayed rehabilitation protocol with an initial phase of strict immobilization. The theoretical “trade-off” of this approach would be to improve the likelihood of tendon healing at the potential expense of an increased risk of postoperative stiffness and a delayed recovery timeline. The current study by Keener and coauthors from Washington University analyzes this question and does so in a superb fashion. In this Level-I, prospective, randomized trial, the authors identified and enrolled 124 patients under the age of sixty-five years who underwent arthroscopic repair of a small or medium tear (<30 mm in anterior-to-posterior …

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.