Abstract

The precise timing of metasomatic events in the Kaapvaal craton lithospheric mantle is poorly constrained and therefore it has proven difficult to relate mantle metasomatism in the source to igneous activity at the surface. A suite of mica–amphibole–rutile–ilmenite–diopside-bearing xenoliths (MARID) represents the product of such metasomatic fluids or melts. In this paper we report results of a SHRIMP and cathodoluminescence study on zircons from four MARID samples from the Kimberley cluster of pipes. Textures combined with experimental evidence suggest that zircons are late crystallizing phases in MARIDs that form close to the solidus where the major precipitating phases are phlogopite and K-richterite. Cathodoluminescence patterns reveal a complex growth history of the zircons involving strong deformation, repeated events of crystallization, resorption and/or modification of the zircon composition, possibly over several millions of years. Many of the U–Pb ages are significantly older than the intrusion age of the group I kimberlites of the Kimberley cluster. Zircon ages in a MARID xenolith from the Wesselton kimberlite vary in the range 113±3 Ma to 142±3 Ma, compared with a pipe age of 84±3 Ma. In two samples from the De Beers, Bultfontein or Dutoitspan pipes, ages range from 85±5 to 119±2 Ma in one and 80±4 to 90±2 Ma in the other. The ages obtained for the latter are indistinguishable from the pipe age of kimberlites belonging to the younger group I kimberlite event (ca. 80–95 Ma). Zircons in this sample, as well as the younger ages in the other, may reflect real ages but most likely have lost radiogenic Pb as a result of deformation and fluid or melt interaction. The presence of pre-group I ages in two of the samples demonstrates unambiguously that the metasomatism that yielded the older crystallization ages cannot be related to the group I kimberlite event. Instead, minimum ages for the MARID zircons coincide with the period of group II kimberlite magmatism in the central to southeastern Kaapvaal craton. This coincidence in ages would be consistent with the contention based on experimental evidence, that MARID-type rocks can be derived from group II precursor magmas by olivine fractionation and exsolution of a carbonatitic component. An alternative possibility, not excluded by the zircon minimum ages, is a genetic relation between MARID metasomatism and Karoo magmatism.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.