Abstract

The relative contributions of objects (i.e., object-based) and underlying spatial (i.e., space-based representations) to attentional prioritization and selection remain unclear. In most experimental circumstances, the two representations overlap thus their respective contributions cannot be evaluated. Here, a dynamic version of the two-rectangle paradigm allowed for a successful de-coupling of spatial and object representations. Space-based (cued spatial location), cued end of the object, and object-based (locations within the cued object) effects were sampled at several timepoints following the cue with high or low certainty as to target location. In the high uncertainty condition spatial benefits prevailed throughout most of the timecourse, as evidenced by facilitatory and inhibitory effects. Additionally, the cued end of the object, rather than a whole object, received the attentional benefit. When target location was predictable (low uncertainty manipulation), only probabilities guided selection (i.e., evidence by a benefit for the statistically biased location). These results suggest that with high spatial uncertainty, all available information present within the stimulus display is used for the purposes of attentional selection (e.g., spatial locations, cued end of the object) albeit to varying degrees and at different time points. However, as certainty increases, only spatial certainty guides selection (i.e., object ends and whole objects are filtered out). Taken together, these results further elucidate the contributing role of space- and object-representations to attentional guidance.

Highlights

  • The relative contributions of objects and underlying spatial to attentional prioritization and selection remain unclear

  • There are two effects that arise as a result: (1) space-based or validity: targets that appear at the cued location are detected faster than those that appear in any other location; and (2) object-based: the SO location targets are detected faster than the DO location targets

  • GENERAL DISCUSSION When examining factors influencing attentional guidance, it is important to examine the contribution of different representations to attentional selection, and to understand the extent of their contributions over time, and under conditions of varying certainty regarding the visual input. Gaining such fine-grained insight will contribute to a more detailed understanding of attentional guidance and prioritization, by determining its focus, the automaticity of this process based on the information available about the local perceptual contingencies, and how the relationship of costs and benefits changes over time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The relative contributions of objects (i.e., object-based) and underlying spatial (i.e., space-based representations) to attentional prioritization and selection remain unclear. When target location was predictable (low uncertainty manipulation), only probabilities guided selection (i.e., evidence by a benefit for the statistically biased location) These results suggest that with high spatial uncertainty, all available information present within the stimulus display is used for the purposes of attentional selection (e.g., spatial locations, cued end of the object) albeit to varying degrees and at different time points. Object-based effects were attributed to attentional spreading or the grouped array principle (Vecera and Farah, 1994; Avrahami, 1999; Shomstein, 2012) According to this view, attention is initially drawn to the cue, and automatically spreads at a predictable rate down the cued object, resulting in a benefit for same-object over different-object targets. More flexible, mechanistic accounts have been put forth as alternatives in an effort to capture a full gamut of behaviors related to object-based attentional guidance

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call