Abstract

The primary reason for using a post is to retain the core with the objective to restore the missing coronal tooth structure. To achieve optimum results, the materials that are used to restore endodontically treated teeth should have physical and mechanical properties that are similar to that of dentin. To characterize the strength parameters of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts with the application of a three-point test. The mean fracture load, flexural strength and flexural modulus were taken into consideration. For the three-point strength tests, 5 kinds of fiberglass root-posts were used: GC Fiber Post (GC America, Alsip, USA), Mirafit White (Hager Werken, Duisburg, Germany), Innopost (InnoTech, Verona, Italy), Rebilda Post (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany), and EverStick Post (GC Europe, Leuven, Belgium). For each system, 15 FRC posts were tested. All posts had the same diameter, length and shape. The three-point test was carried out in accordance with ISO 10477:2004, using the Instron-5944 testing machine (Instron, Norwood, USA). The test was carried out until the sample was broken. The highest force values (67.6 N) were recorded for the GC posts, and the lowest force required to break the sample (29.6 N) was noted for the EverStick Posts. In the case of bending strength, the highest values were also recorded for GC posts (912.4 MPa). Low bending strengths were obtained for the Mirafit White posts (537.2 MPa); however, the EverStick Posts were the weakest (436.2 MPa). Rebilda posts showed the highest modulus of elasticity - 31.1 GPa. The lowest values of the elastic modulus were registered for EverStick Posts - 12.5 GPa. There were statistically significant differences in fracture loads, flexural strengths and flexural modulus of the FRC-post systems tested. Individually polymerized FRC material showed lower flexural properties than compared prefabricated FRC posts.

Highlights

  • Posts provide retention for dental materials while the missing coronal tooth structure is being restored

  • The mean fracture load, flexural strength and flexural modulus were taken into consideration

  • In the case of bending strength, the highest values were recorded for GC posts (912.4 MPa)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Posts provide retention for dental materials while the missing coronal tooth structure is being restored. Prefabricated and cast metal posts are rigid in nature.[11]. One of the major reasons that motivated researchers to find alternative solutions to metal posts was to prevent root fracture, which was the main cause of failure with this type of restoration. The biomechanical properties of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts have been reported to be similar to that of dentin.[12–14]. The primary reason for using a post is to retain the core with the objective to restore the missing coronal tooth structure. The materials that are used to restore endodontically treated teeth should have physical and mechanical properties that are similar to that of dentin

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call