The Three Blessings: Boundaries, Censorship, and Identity in Jewish Liturgy (review)

Abstract

The Three Blessings: Boundaries, Censorship, and Identity in Jewish Liturgy, by Yoel Kahn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. 244 pp. $45.00. Perhaps no other liturgical rubric in the Jewish prayerbook has evoked so much intensive discussion in Jewish and inter-religious discourse as well as in academic inquiry, as this that is the topic of Kahn's The Three Blessings. These blessings are: Blessed are You Adonai Ruler of the universe, did not make a gentile / did not make a slave / did not make a woman. They already appear in the Tannaitic literature and are recited at least from the ninth or tenth century as part of the early morning worship. They were the center of extremely heated debates within in the Jewish world and without. Indeed, if you want to determine whether a certain Jewish prayerbook is Ashkenazi or Sepharadic, Orthodox or Liberal, if you want to inquire about its political orientation, the degree of its gender sensitivity and liturgical innovation- turn to the opening pages of the Siddur and note the way that these three blessings are treated. Observing their order, translation, commentary, font size, and actual wording may serve as a litmus test for a prayerbook's theological, ideological, and aesthetic orientation. Kahn's endeavor to examine closely these blessings from their first appearance in classical rabbinic literature to the liturgy created by gays and lesbians in contemporary North America, casts light upon these aspects of prayer and the worshipers recited them. Some say that the entire universe is reflected in and may be observed through a single droplet of dew. Reading The Three Blessings may be described as such experience-it teaches not only about the history of these specific blessings but also about wider questions of inclusion in a canon, authority, identity, and censorship from within and from without in Jewish liturgy. Kahn leads the reader on a journey beginning with the ancient origins of the blessings, which he identifies with a Hellenistic statement attributed to Socrates or Plato, then moves to the early tannaitic formulation of the blessings, and then to their textual revision in the Babylonian Talmud. The journey continues with discussions relating to the blessings' function in the Geonic literature, where they become part of the morning ritual in the synagogue, their special formulations in the Cairo Geniza, and the external and internal censorship that affected their form and performance in the middle ages. He carefully surveys commentaries from the mystical traditions, new adaptations in the Reform movement in Europe, and finally new innovative uses and perceptions of the blessings in contemporary North America. One of the important things that one should bear in mind when approaching ancient texts, and liturgical texts are certainly no exception, is that we usually know very little about their original Sitz im Leben, their existential context. We have insufficient knowledge about those created them and about the exact context and function they may have had. Kahn himself says about the blessings he examines: there never was an ur (version) that all subsequent arrangements modified (p. 40). However, in more than one case he seems to make some strong assumptions that cannot be proven. For example, he discusses the fascinating similarity between Hellenistic aphorisms, recorded in various forms, and the thanksgiving statement for being born a man and not an animal, a woman, a Greek or a Barbarian. The typological resemblance is indeed remarkable, but Kahn continues arguing (like some other scholars before him), that the Jewish who did not make me blessings are a direct response to the Hellenistic text. …