Abstract

The Lesser Caucasus mountains sit on a transition within the Arabia–Eurasia collision zone between very thin lithosphere (<100 km) to the west, under Eastern Anatolia, and a very thick lithospheric root (up to 200 km) in the east, under western Iran. A transect of volcanic highlands running from NW to SE in the Lesser Caucasus allows us to look at the effects of lithosphere thickness variations on the geochemistry of volcanic rocks in this continental collision zone. Volcanic rocks from across the region show a wide compositional range from basanites to rhyolites, and have arc-like geochemical characteristics, typified by ubiquitous negative Nb–Ta anomalies. Magmatic rocks from the SE, where the lithosphere is thought to be thicker, are more enriched in incompatible trace elements, especially the light rare earth elements, Sr and P. They also have more radiogenic ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr, and less radiogenic ¹⁴³Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd. Across the region, there is no correlation between SiO₂ content and Sr–Nd isotope ratios, revealing a lack of crustal contamination. Instead, ‘spiky’ mid-ocean ridge basalt normalized trace element patterns are the result of derivation from a subduction-modified mantle source, which probably inherited its subduction component from subduction of the Tethys Ocean prior to the onset of continent–continent collision in the late Miocene. In addition to the more isotopically enriched mantle source, modelling of non-modal batch melting suggests lower degrees of melting and the involvement of garnet as a residual phase in the SE. Melt thermobarometry calculations based on bulk-rock major elements confirm that melting in the SE must occur at greater depths in the mantle. Temperatures of melting below 1200°C, along with the subduction-modified source, suggest that melting occurred within the lithosphere. It is proposed that in the northern Lesser Caucasus this melting occurs close to the base of the very thin lithosphere (at a depth of ∼45 km) as a result of small-scale delamination. A striking similarity between the conditions of melting in NW Iran and the southern Lesser Caucasus (two regions between which the difference in lithosphere thickness is ∼100 km) suggests a common mechanism of melt generation in the mid-lithosphere (∼75 km). The southern Lesser Caucasus magmas result from mixing between partial melts of deep lithosphere (∼120 km in the south) and mid-lithosphere sources to give a composition intermediate between magmas from the northern Lesser Caucasus and NW Iran. The mid-lithosphere magma source has a distinct composition compared with the base of the lithosphere, which is argued to be the result of the increased retention of metasomatic components in phases such as apatite and amphibole, which are stabilized by lower temperatures prior to magma generation.

Highlights

  • The Arabia-Eurasia collision zone is one of the very few places on Earth where it is possible to study active volcanism associated with a continent-continent collision event

  • SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Magmas generated in the thicker lithosphere of the southern Lesser Caucasus have higher incompatible trace element concentrations, higher 87Sr/86Sr ratios and lower 143Nd/144Nd ratios than volcanic rocks from the northern Lesser Caucasus

  • This subduction component is uniform across the Lesser Caucasus and is likely inherited from Mesozoic (Tethyan) slab subduction prior to continental collision

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Arabia-Eurasia collision zone is one of the very few places on Earth where it is possible to study active volcanism associated with a continent-continent collision event. The lithospheric structure of this plateau is considered to show a strong contrast between very thin mantle lithosphere in the west (below Eastern Anatolia), and very thick mantle lithosphere in the Zagros Core to the SE (Fig. 1), below western Iran (Priestley et al, 2012). The Lesser Caucasus mountains sit close to the edge of the Zagros Core region, and close to a transition from thick to thin lithosphere. The Priestley et al (2012) model is used because it is likely to give better local resolution in the Lesser Caucasus region than other global lithospheric thickness studies (Priestley & McKenzie, 2006, 2013)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call