The therapy process with depressed adolescents who drop out of psychoanalytic psychotherapy: an empirical case study

Abstract

ABSTRACT Psychotherapy dropout is a common phenomenon in youth mental health, often due to dissatisfaction with treatment. However, little is known about the therapeutic processes that precede dropout due to dissatisfaction. This mixed-methods empirical case study aimed to explore the therapeutic process of a 12-session, prematurely ended therapy with a young person with depression in short-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy (STPP). The Adolescent Psychotherapy Q-set (APQ), an empirically validated process measure, was used as a framework for qualitative analysis exploring the therapy process over time. Analysis of APQ ratings of the 12 sessions found a productive patient-therapy dyad working collaboratively to understand the young person’s experiences and emotions. Following an initial phase of the young person presenting as emotional and vulnerable, she became increasingly ambivalent about continuing in psychotherapy. A lively and argumentative period exploring the young person’s ambivalence and increased sense of well-being culminated in eventual dropout. This study suggests that even in a strong, collaborative working relationship with an engaged young person, ambivalence around dependency and vulnerability can threaten treatment completion. Therapists’ enhanced sensitivity to relevant processes that precede therapy dropout have the potential to improve engagement of young people in psychotherapy, which may optimise outcomes.