Abstract

In a study drawing from both evolutionary biology and the social sciences, evidence and argument is assembled in support of the comprehensive application of selfish gene theory to the human population. With a focus on genes giving rise to characteristically-human cooperation (“cooperative genes”) involving language and theory of mind, one may situate a whole range of patterned behaviour—including celibacy and even slavery—otherwise seeming to present insuperable difficulties. Crucially, the behaviour which tends to propagate the cooperative genes may be “at cost” to the genes of some who may be party to the cooperation itself. Explanatory insights are provided by Trivers’ parent-offspring conflict theory, Lack’s principle, and Hamilton’s kin selection mechanism. A primary observation is that cooperation using language and theory of mind is itself interdependent with full human conceptualization of a world of objects and of themselves as embodied beings. Human capacities inhering in, or arising out of, the ability to cooperate are also responsible for a vitally important long-term process, the domestication of animals and plants. The approach illuminates the difference between animal and human sexual behaviour, and the emergence of kinship systems. Again, recent patterns of population growth become much more explicable. It is argued that the gene is the single controlling replicator; the notion of the meme as a second independent replicator is flawed.

Highlights

  • Darwin was unfamiliar with the notion of a gene

  • In a study drawing from both evolutionary biology and the social sciences, evidence and argument is assembled in support of the comprehensive application of selfish gene theory to the human population

  • The Importance of Aggregates Rather Than Individuals. It follows from the theory of the selfish gene that, in becoming established, new genes such as these give rise to behaviour which tends in the and subsequent generations to promulgate the new genes themselves i.e. in this case the genetic change would tend to give rise to a large and increasing population of people with the new cooperative genes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This is an attempt to test the theory of the selfish gene in relation to the human population It takes something of the form of a feasibility study, whereby the aim is to judge whether patterns in human life may be interpreted within that theoretical context. What is being got at by reference to “theory of mind” is the human ability to attribute mental states to others, to theorise how other humans’ thought processes work e.g. to grasp their intentions and reasons for action (Carruthers & Smith, 1996); that ability is itself enhanced by language use Since prior to this genetic change there would already have been patterned interaction between close blood relatives, it is important to make clear that, following the change, cooperation of the type indicated is possible between both those with and those without blood ties. It may be judged that this is interdependent both with the human use of language and their utilisation of theory of mind

The Conceptual Basis of Human Cooperation
The Importance of Aggregates Rather Than Individuals
A Best-of-a-Bad-Job Strategy
Domestication
Key Elements of the Social Fabric
10. The Social Contract
11. Society and Population
12. Religion and Population
13. Patterns in Prehistory and History
Findings
15. Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call