The Theory of Inclusive FitnessA review of Social Evolution and Inclusive Fitness Theory: An Introduction. By James A. R. Marshall. Princeton (New Jersey): Princeton University Press. $39.95. xix + 195 p.; ill.; index. ISBN: 978-0-691-16156-3. 2015.

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Theory of Inclusive Fitness A review of Social Evolution and Inclusive Fitness Theory: An Introduction. By James A. R. Marshall. Princeton (New Jersey): Princeton University Press. $39.95. xix + 195 p.; ill.; index. ISBN: 978-0-691-16156-3. 2015.David C. QuellerDavid C. QuellerDepartment of Biology, Washington UniversitySt. Louis, Missouri 63130-4899 USA Search for more articles by this author Department of Biology, Washington UniversitySt. Louis, Missouri 63130-4899 USAe-mail: [email protected]PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Quarterly Review of Biology Volume 91, Number 3September 2016 Published in association with Stony Brook University Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/688099 Views: 289Total views on this site Citations: 3Citations are reported from Crossref For permission to reuse, please contact [email protected]PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Toru Miura, Kohei Oguchi, Haruka Yamaguchi, Mayuko Nakamura, Daisuke Sato, Kenta Kobayashi, Nobuyuki Kutsukake, Kyoko Miura, Yoshinobu Hayashi, Masaru Hojo, Kiyoto Maekawa, Shuji Shigenobu, Takeshi Kano, Akio Ishiguro Understanding of superorganisms: collective behavior, differentiation and social organization, Artificial Life and Robotics 27, no.22 (Mar 2022): 204–212.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-022-00754-xApril M. Becker The flight of the locus of selection: Some intricate relationships between evolutionary elements, Behavioural Processes 161 (Apr 2019): 31–44.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.01.002James AR Marshall What is inclusive fitness theory, and what is it for?, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 12 (Dec 2016): 103–108.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.09.015